I think we’re talk in at cross purposes AP. The definition of homeopathy is clear and not open to interpretation (this from the NHS):
‘It's based on a series of ideas developed in the 1790s by a...
Type: Posts; User: Matt8500
I think we’re talk in at cross purposes AP. The definition of homeopathy is clear and not open to interpretation (this from the NHS):
‘It's based on a series of ideas developed in the 1790s by a...
I think you’ve managed that with your intelligent contribution and rapier wit... [emoji4]
Indeed, that’s my area [emoji4]. I’ve worked in oncology for 20 years and the past few have been really exciting. New potential targets are being identified all the time and NGS allows testing for...
Wasn’t aware of that one, interesting! PCR is amazing tech and, as you said, has allowed some incredible advances. Not least in cancer research and treatment, allowing more bespoke therapies.
Agree, not sure how scientifically validating a ‘natural chemical’ is the same as diluting random substances to the point they are no longer actually present.
There have been some amazing...
They do deliberately, I guess to make the point. Science is not one dimensional unlike the belief required for homeopathy. Some diseases are homogenous and can be treated the same in everyone, some...
It has been proven over and over to not work, and the theory behind it to be completely implausible.
Most conventional medicine looks to treat the cause not the symptoms btw, from antibiotics to...
Agree with the above:
The difference is making money from people’s fears and illness, preying on the vulnerable and gullible. Also the word alternative implies foregoing actual proven medicine....
Can you please share the evidence for homeopathy?
I’m not aware of any at all in a peer reviewed medical journal so this would be quite a revelation.
Don’t waste your money, and I would seriously question your doctor as there is no evidence that it’s harmful. I would be very surprised if they were actually GMC registered giving that advice.