Search:

Possibly one of the 10,000 post features. Don't recall for sure.

Same as the free SC vouchers scheme.

I agree with these points.

I'd say that this is a 'moral' or philosophical question and I'm not going to answer it. Not because I don't have an answer (it is necessarily a personal, subjective, answer) but because my answer...

Of course. This has not been in doubt.

The point to remember in this context is that, as far as I am aware, no private information has been published. Everything published has been public...

No one is forced to use this community. As I said above, it is opt-in.

There can be no expectation that any particular community can be or has to be suitable for every person.

As such, it is...

Thanks for your clarity. I think this is the first time you've made it clear that your concern here is about subjective opinion/'taste' (again, for want of a better term), not about whether what...

People often say this but it's not really fully the case. Much is kept forever somewhere but a lot of stuff is fleeting. Archives and indexing engines simply don't catch everything because their...

Personally, nothing that has happened here meets what I think is a reasonable or rational definition of "doxing". It's all originally public information or otherwise infer-able and, as such, is...

Personally I think that compliance with the law (in this specific context) is quite important for reasons of avoiding hypocrisy.

That said, I wholeheartedly agree with you that there is no serious...

It seems to me that now we come to the crux of the issue. What you are really doing here is a psychological assessment, i.e. an assessment of preference and 'taste' (for want of a better term), all...

Lawyers will always want more law. ;-) It tells us nothing whatsoever of the true rights and wrongs. The hypothetical future is also wholly irrelevant to what is happening now.

Furthermore, you...

Yes, I noticed. The links I provided and my comments most certainly do apply to that observation.



What exactly is it that makes you feel that a reply is required? You asking the question does...

Why do you imagine that? On what grounds, exactly? The thing is that you don't need to imagine anything at all. You can check for yourself against the relevant legislation I linked in #509. There are...

Whatever one thinks of Raffe in general, there is nothing unlawful about his research, collection, or storage of data as far as I can tell. I am taking GDPR, etc. into account when I say this.

If...

In the UK I doubt they'd care, if they even looked or noticed.

Of course, if you were bringing in 100 that might be different.

Like Rolexes...

Not that I wish to defend anyone who might or might not deserve it but it seems to me that if funds really are in short supply then selling other assets might be a good way to raise the money to make...

It will be interesting to see if the package makes its way back to the sender, as it should -- or just disappears.

The problem is that refusing delivery robs you of the physical evidence, the very evidence that is (potentially) needed to put in a claim (regardless of whether it is the sender or recipient who...

Hopefully this will assist with the sender's claim.

(But I still think that retaining the original physical evidence is better when it comes to making claims).

There's no need for the vendor to wait. When he sees the pics he will know that the item didn't reach you. His claim against PF is a separate matter.




While the claim against PF is certainly...

Since you refused delivery the package should now make its way back to the sender, as long as the sender put his address on it. Hopefully he did.

For the sender to put in a claim for loss he'll...

They will always attempt to delivery if possible. That's what they are there to do afterall. It's not for them to decide that something is not worth delivering, even if damage is obvious.