Justice always relies on the respective professional capabilities/diligence of both the defence and the prosecution. I have little doubt that Andrew would have had a satisfyingly competent defence...
Type: Posts; User: Saint-Just
Justice always relies on the respective professional capabilities/diligence of both the defence and the prosecution. I have little doubt that Andrew would have had a satisfyingly competent defence...
That’s sounds very much like you require the level of proof needed to prove a husband adulterous in the old days.
$12,000,000 given to someone he never met for something he never did.
Well I don't think much of the queuing. I have a few friends who went, with their children, and were glad they did so that's good enough for me.
However yesterday's ceremony was superbly...
Exactly. And we both know how hard it is to catch a squirrel in winter! :icon_biggrin:
I actually know this.
Hence my belief that this queue is entirely deliberate.
I don't think so. I think that the Met did what they were told, and their professional expertise was to make it happen, not to decide what form it could take.
As to who decides on what the protocol...
It is definitely a social catharsis and as such the queuing is probably seen as essential, much like some pilgrimages had to be done on one's knees.
Of course, you can then question who decided it...
Sounds very much like “panem et circenses”.
The queue could have been much smaller if managed with a ticketing system, like they do in museums for special exhibitions. Everything else is apparently...