Search:

Yes.

It is thanks for asking.

I'd struggle around you lot to be fair.

And what was that? Since you appear to know. I still have the message from Eddie telling me why by the way.

Fair enough. No offence taken.

My post was simply stating the facts about redundancies and not being so many workers to go on strike.

If you want to have a go at people 'bickering or bitching about workers rights' I suggest you...

That is factual. There won't be so many to strike after the redundancies. Don't tell me what to do. You're not a moderator on here.

I'm not playing the victim at all. It was a serious question. And if you follow the link in my post you will see it is factual. You just seem to want to provoke something thats all.

You seem to have a problem with me. I don't recall doing anything to you.

Sigh.

I have no dog in the fight, simply stating what was in the news. But hey, another dig under your belt son.

Won't be so many on the picket lines soon apparently. "Royal Mail to cut up to 10,000 roles, blaming strikes and lower parcel volumes"

...