Yes, agreed.
I found the cost as a justification for using a real gun strange though - surely the cost is miniscule in the context of the film's budget.
Type: Posts; User: Kingstepper
Yes, agreed.
I found the cost as a justification for using a real gun strange though - surely the cost is miniscule in the context of the film's budget.
Wouldn’t the lady killed be behind (or very near) the camera?
Was pointing it at the camera as required for the shot, not really difficult to explain.
Someone involved in production was speaking on BBC news saying that is what they do now. Obviously not universal.