Strong irony in that statement..
Nobody here is saying everyone has to like the display back, that's subjective. But perhaps a reasonable inbetween would not be saying anyone who did like the...
Type: Posts; User: M1011
Strong irony in that statement..
Nobody here is saying everyone has to like the display back, that's subjective. But perhaps a reasonable inbetween would not be saying anyone who did like the...
Snore.
Yes, an opinion, not a fact. Now you're getting it :playful:
I'm in support of Seiko doing this. Why not? It's a well finished, hand made and innovative movement, not some cheap quartz junk. ...
That's an opinion and you're entitled to it, whereas saying this movement looks like it's from a pound shop is simply nonsensical.
Nonsense.
Excellent. Really excited to see what they do with this range next. The caseback is quartz-made-into-art. I'd love to see a no-date version of a GS quartz, but I doubt it'll be on the cards.
Perhaps it's the lighting, but it appears there's no logo on the back glass in these photos. I'm very OK with that change if it is the case!
I'm not sure the distinction was particularly pertinent to the point being made, but fair enough.
I keep looking back at this one. Great watch. I think if they make a habit of display case 9F's then I'll need to get one. I hope they ditch the date and give us one that's a tad more toned down.
...
Oh wow, 9F with a display back, that's new!
Love this. Probably not going to spend Ł3k on it, but it does look well worth it.