I hope so. They were at their best releasing cheaper Rolex alternatives.
Type: Posts; User: JP Chestnut
I hope so. They were at their best releasing cheaper Rolex alternatives.
It’s almost like everyone is talking to different people, most of which just make it up.
It's basically the Tudor version of the 16610LV. It's not very original in any way. That's OK. The original LV's are too expensive for many and the new ceramic version is... not nice looking.
It's a nice looking watch and a much better modern update to the 16610lv than the current green ceramic.
I hope everyone who wants one gets one, and everyone who bought it as an investment loses...
Never underestimate a company's desire to increase short to revenue.
One incredibly hot brand new BB sold for $8,000, therefore an old one that hasn't appreciated in any real way is on its way to $10,000? Ok.
TRF is WUS with more money.
WUS is filled with idiots. You may have found their king.
Do you seriously think that's a possibility? If so, read more about Rolex.
Generic Kermit seems fitting.
Do I think Tudor is diluting the BB? Absolutely. Does it have anything to due with a department store LE? Not at all.
This is a fun little novelty watch. What's more troubling is when 70% of...
Same as usual. Slab sided, rather than thick in an absolute sense.
Supposedly on the case back.
They went with the faded lime look LV insert.