I doubt, if the buyer sued him, that the courts would give the fraudster any credit. He basically lied by suggesting that the watch might be real. He knew it wasn't otherwise why even mention...
Type: Posts; User: David_D
I doubt, if the buyer sued him, that the courts would give the fraudster any credit. He basically lied by suggesting that the watch might be real. He knew it wasn't otherwise why even mention...
You didn’t need to with this one. The seller had the brass neck to put in black and white that it “might” not be real. No-one would list a genuine expensive watch that way.
Unbelievable conclusion!
Apparently the purchaser is delighted with his overpriced fake!
https://feedback.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=cheapshot13&ftab=AllFeedback
...
Of course he knows. Hiding behind the authenticity disclaimer. "I inherited the watch so cannot prove history nor it authenticity. I am guessing it is genuine Tudor but cannot be sure so please bid...
And another!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/rolex-datejust/292996191452
"Rolex datejust my grandad gave it to me before he passed"
I suspect that it's the 1 in 10 times eBay removes a fake!
This is an alternative approach. Presumably not even a fake watch, just images nicked from others listings/sites:
...
Loads of them!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Men-s-Rolex-Oyster-perpetual-watch/183716275007
Not even using the model name but a very touching description:
"Men's Rolex Oyster Perpetual...
There’s no good reason to disclaim authenticity. No-one who thought they had a genuine expensive brand watch would list it without asking a jeweller for an opinion.
Presumably believes that the claim to not know whether it is authentic gives some protection when it is proved not to be. Where the law stands on that, I don’t know but if buying from eBay wasn’t...
As soon as you read the “inherited” story on an eBay listing you know it’s a fake.