Either way, even if keeping with tradition I still struggle to understand this adhering to a certain specification
(1000m resulting in an ungainly watch) when the watch is worthless as a divers...
Type: Posts; User: hafle
Either way, even if keeping with tradition I still struggle to understand this adhering to a certain specification
(1000m resulting in an ungainly watch) when the watch is worthless as a divers...
You're looking at Eddie's picture from last December, he uploaded a new one a couple of days ago
Reading back, looks like it'll be about 14mm thick. So possibly a nonatarter for me as well unless the thickness is cleverly hidden unlike with the vanguard. 1000m certainly seems odd if it can't...
Case thickness?
16mm does seem quite thick given the render sheet states its only rated at 300m. My sea dweller is 15.5mm I think, and it doesn't look ridiculous, but I'd rather it was thinner.
That looks fantastic Eddie!