I find the attitude and approach of all the above odd, demonstrably egotistical (particularly the first sentence), and generally unpleasant so won't be bothering my (over sensitive) arse with you...
Type: Posts; User: size11s
I find the attitude and approach of all the above odd, demonstrably egotistical (particularly the first sentence), and generally unpleasant so won't be bothering my (over sensitive) arse with you...
I really think that this is a case of thinking/wishing something into having some credence.....bedtime now. Hope I don't dream of the venerable, high spec/quality 6B/346 reduced to low quality tat.
It appears to be issue number 441 in '52 and then issue number 3336 in '14. I would be interested to see a JLC Mk 11 double issued as such, and so far apart, particularly without one being struck...
What did you make of the strange conglomeration of 'military designation/issue' numbers though?
Hi Matt, it was watched over on MWR too.....
https://www.mwrforum.net/forums/showthread.php?86612-Smiths-(Mickey-Mouse)-Mk11&p=330334#post330334