Now that is a much better looking watch.
Type: Posts; User: RAJEN
Now that is a much better looking watch.
Ken, you are missing the point. Big time.
Other than Andy ( somewhat ) saying that he wouldn’t spend this money on Seiko, what most people are saying is they wouldn’t spend that money on THIS Seiko....
Facepalm right back at you.
You totally misconstrued the argument
It is not about the intrinsic value of the watch at all.
It is about the fact that IMO and several others for the same money you...
A risky move, IMO. Hope you don’t regret it.
Good luck,anyways.
And some labor under the impression that orgasmic delight at mention of Credor is somehow a sign of good taste and ability to appreciate finer things.
FWIW, I prefer your enamel watch visually to...
There are better looking Credors for sure than the plain Jane in this thread- which is just a piece of enamel with rather lovely blue hands stuck on it. The back is nice but not 40,000k nice. Doubt...
For a watch to punch above its weight ( in this case 40,000) it would have to be far more than this Credor.
As for Dufour, this one has ten times the character of that Credor
...
Sure.
If one wanted non ostentatious quality, IMO there are a lot of better watches for 40,000.
This enamel dial thingy wouldn’t hold my interest for more than five min, let alone years.
Anyway if...
What is stealth wealth? Wearing a £40,000 watch that looks like a £150 watch??
It looks nice and all but is a little underwhelming. There are quite a few Grand Seikos I would pick over this. I am...