Thanks Matt, I confess I didn't study your pic. It never ceases to amaze me how folk choose to believe things and then spend large amounts of cash according to that belief. The tiniest bit of...
Type: Posts; User: size11s
Thanks Matt, I confess I didn't study your pic. It never ceases to amaze me how folk choose to believe things and then spend large amounts of cash according to that belief. The tiniest bit of...
Hi Matt, is this just the auction house playing fast and loose with the facts as 1952 (as they suggest) is too early to have Explorer on the dial, surely. I know very little about Rolex I admit. Is...
I am not stirring any pudding but thought this might be of interest here, a 6098 with explorer on the dial.....particularly the text of the auction listing. It made a very healthy price I thought at...
Not to make light of a most serious topic but it might help diffuse the tension and will certainly amuse your watch aware listeners if you tried to get the words 'bolt spring' into the discussion, or...
The very best of luck on the airwaves Rev-O, I will keep an ear out. Not only as it is you but as it is a very important topic that affects a much larger % of the population than publicly admits to...
....There was a sharp intake of breath, the crowd started to rise.....and applause slowly, nervously broke out and spread through the gathered onlookers. A Green baseball cap with a strange crown...
There was an A209 (same dial/movement but not in an Aquatite case) advertised in 1952.
It was my understanding from reading other threads/forums that the watches presented to the expedition party...
I have little to add to this debate, so many seem to have a very in depth knowledge. I am a little confused however concerning the "A409". Pictured below is what SmithS marketed as an A409. ...