Is the Tudor PO1 still fugly?
When it was released it polarized opinions, and really became a marmite of a watch.
I bought one because it’s quirkiness appealed to me and I wanted something different, but was quickly frustrated by the lack of strap options due to the massive end link/bezel lock mechanisms.
These were bolted in and you were stuck with what you had... or so we thought!
I had finally succumbed to lockdown boredom and decided to have another go at removing those beasts that had thwarted off previous attempts.
Well, It turns out they are actually very easy to remove. It may have been delicate hands with a new watch at the last attempt.
So, is it still the fugly thing, or does it now belong on the cool wall?
For me it just got a whole lot better, and I’ll be now looking to get some decent straps for it.
See what you think -
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...b4a0896a52.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...34f99fc909.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...aa349c0ad9.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...3490f1310d.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a9b0697b32.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a6cbbe2eec.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...271d530d41.jpg
Sent using Tapatalk. Excuse the lack of apostrophes.
Is the Tudor PO1 still fugly?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dave+63
I would like to see it on a bracelet without the bezel locks. The watch itself is ok but the excess metal of the bezel locks throws it out of proportion.
If you could get end links that don’t cover the bezel, I think it would look fine.
Agreed, Dave. I don't have a 22mm bracelet with straight end links with me, and they're not too easy to source here.
I've found this one. It's probably made of pastry, but it'll give me a better idea of what it could look like, and is only £4.61.
https://i.imgur.com/mfmFDVF.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/wMQasLm.jpg