http://memecrunch.com/meme/4FGZZ/vic....png?w=400&c=1
Printable View
I’m glad the watch ended up in the rightful owner’s hands.
Aside from that I don’t think his input to this forum will be missed. Good riddance.
Give the guy a break, he’s a 67 year old (or 68) pensioner with IBS expecting the end of the world….. post 1647
https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.p...25#post5351425
Good to see a happy ending but strange how a post for help descends rapidly.
I'm hearing David Attenborough's hushed tones, while crouching in the Serengeti ...................
"and with the disappearance of the original prey................the pack - turn on each other............................"
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/40013...ormat&fit=max&
Let’s hope the walkout is final
https://i.postimg.cc/QdfRvT7V/9-C701...-FE6979708.jpgphoto sharing
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Putting aside the "fluff" of the distracting noises which latterly affected this thread, does anyone have an update on the loss?
Thanks.
The mods are consulting their legal team.
just a quick update
Rolex Uk have been very helpful
my 'legal team' much to the amusement of some are now in operation
no blame in any way shape or form is made against Rolex UK nor Goldsmiths
but there was NO ERROR made by a jeweller in the 2015 Insurance claim about a stolen watch
the facts - Rolex UK received a Police Crime number and in the insurance claim my watches details were supplied with serial and model number which was cross checked by Rolex UK before my watch was placed on the lost/stolen database
the police will shortly become involved because this is fraud
the facts - a watch legally bought in 2011 and verified as such was reported stolen in 2015 and paid out by Direct Line
the claimant had my watches serial number and model number - HOW?
how do you get my watches serial number and model number unless you had previous access to the watch?
so mock all you like
direct Line paid out
actually the cheapest 'brown' is in Worksop about eight miles from me
certainly a former mining village and in truth not far from being described as the arsehole at the end of the universe
why am i living here?
i came came back to look after very elderly parents who have since died
i planned to sell up and move to the country and enjoy my shooing/fishing
Covid put my plans on hold for over two years
the tax paid can be confirmed and i still have another payment due but that does not stop your mocking
old guy, yes, if that matters?
IBS - not something i would recommend but proverbially 'shit happens' ,lol
now have skin cancer on my face but have a procedure due on 12 April
i guess many of you wish i might die whilst under the knife - very nice of you
but i will report back on the Rolex issue
might i ask why a legal team is so inflammatory to you lot?
i have solicitors who deal with property/tax/company law etc etc - so yes, they are a team
Here we go again
Well, as you ask, and it's nothing but a guess, but the most obvious way is that you are somehow involved! Someone must have done it and you are someone; don't try to deny it. This would make your high profile rudeness make sense as you might have been trying to establish your story memorably. Unfortunately, that may have been your first mistake and you would have got away with it too if it wasn't for those meddling kids.
Someone is in for a nasty surprise. Why would you not think that at some point the genuine owner will send it in to Rolex for a service at some point in the future.
I guess they thought that after 4 years no one will ever know.
Dumb.
Sent from my SM-N986B using Tapatalk
Strange guy. He has a way with words that totally inhibits any empathy one might feel.
All I am left with is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4uivPpzCGo
The problem with this one is that Goldsmiths have no record of their dealings with the watch. Proving that whoever sold it to them and whoever made the claim are one and the same, seems rather difficult now.
If Goldsmiths paid out the purchase via a bank account, it could be possible to have the insurance claimants bank accounts, for the year prior to Nick H buying it, examined.
The watch may have been taken in part exchange, which would mean a payment to Goldsmiths rather than from. Of course the seller to Goldsmiths may have paid any trade-in value shortfall in cash.
The only way round this is for all trade-ins taken to be recorded centrally so that when claims are made, they could be cross-referenced. Whether that would be cost-effective or not is another matter.
Sent from my CLT-L09 using TZ-UK mobile app
Having twice grown angry with those who tried to help you and twice promised never to return, you have then twice returned.
That doesn't make for an especially credible correspondent, but if you wish to see loose ends tied up :
I asked you to indicate any specifics that were not legally correct. There has been no response from you and in the absence of same should this reflect on the validity of your comment or the quality of the solicitor's advice?
Really? What civil matter is there for you to pursue here? You have lost nothing, patience and dignity excepted.
Must it be fraud? It could have been an honest mistake. For example, many people will erroneously transpose numbers in longer alphanumeric strings.
Rolex watches were historically made in batches, such that a 16233 with case number R620533 might be part of a batch of several hundred or a few thousand 16233s, with consecutive case numbers. If that watch were then mis-reported as R620553, the number would still correspond with a 16233, the latter watch thereby erroneously but innocently recorded as stolen.
In the real world every member of tz-uk would wish you well with the other challenges you face, but in this specific matter you do seem needlessly to have taken a small problem and made it much bigger for yourself.
Have you ever posted a picture of said watch on a watch forum, eBay or anywhere else with the serial or card on display?
I guess this is why most of us try to not show the serial on any pictures posted.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and crudely guess the tax bill, if real, was inheritance related.
You know when you walk into a room to unexpectedly find some intense exchange going on, so you just back out without making eye contact?
Well, that.
I have reported your post to the Mods.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b9/e0...060b11cb8b.gif
Every time I click on this thread ‘Should I stay or should I go’ starts to play in my head.
I'm puzzled. Surely, someone with a claimed tax bill of £250k would be wearing something a tad better than a Rolex?