New model just announced...
https://www.rolex.com/watches/new-wa...ate-diver.html
Printable View
New model just announced...
https://www.rolex.com/watches/new-wa...ate-diver.html
Exact timing as the other thread. I prefer your title though.
https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?518366
It looks good, and will certainly appeal to the 'top-trumps' collectors - that is a crazy WD rating!
On the plus side - should be sig lighter than the SS 'cooking' model, but JEEZ! What a thickness of watch!
Aeshetically - I would remove the imperial depth rating and leave the metric value.
50mm ... that's a big watch ...
SO...who's going to volunteer to buy one and try it out???
I suspect that most of them will never even get wet..........
Insane! Would love one but £22,000 so not happening.
Rather steals the thunder of the Omega Ultra Deep. Wonder which will actually be available first?!
50mm will look fine on a diving suit and that is its intended purpose. If someone wants to spend £22k and look like a complete Herbert wearing an ostentatious saucer with a suit, then fair enough. It's their money at the end of the day.
Agreed. I would only add that it also would look silly with a diving suit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P
It’s impressive that they have managed to mass produce a watch with these specs.
That surely depends on where and when you are wearing the diving suit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idontgram
Good grief. Have they jumped the shark with this?
Proper black matt dial. They should use this on the Submariner. Lovely brushed titanium too.
Love the clasp and the polishing of the titanium. Beyond that…. Nope!
What do you think lug width is? 24mm?
Quote:
Originally Posted by markrlondon
"Containing aluminium, strontium, dysprosium and europium "
The website is beginning to sound more like a woman's makeup or shampoo advert.
or
One might almost think that it is all sheep s**t :-)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...39914001005185
B
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by Toshk
I willQuote:
Originally Posted by MrGrumpy
Already put myself on the list and I promise that and if I get it you'll see A LOT of wet pictures :)
Anywhere but the Marianas Trench I'd imagine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
It’s for my brother in law. Ex professional basketball player so shouldn’t look that ridiculous on him. But who knows how this wears in real life [emoji51]
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...272bf8f2f7.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...c9150f02f6.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...b2fc2d820e.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...7c180cfc08.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...79ca75dbc8.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...f01279aae9.jpg
^^^
What size are your wrists?
That really does look like a VERY large lump of watch!!
Not sure tbh. Think it was 18.5cm according Watch Finder measurement tool a couple of years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maysie
I feel sorry for the door frames this watch will inevitably smash lol.
What an absolutely stupid watch but for months now I can’t stop hunting videos and pictures. For as awful as it is it’s bloody cool
Would love to see one in the flesh. I can only just get away with my DSSD so would never be able to wear one even if I could get hold of one.
A friend has one and he can carry it off.........I tried it on and just laughed at how silly it looked on me! But, my, the engineering is somethig special for this piece.
Tried one on last year , I’d say the watch is almost unwearable day to day .
Makes a sub non date look minuscule.
If that didn’t have a Rolex logo on the dial, people on here would be ripping that just as much as those gargantuan fashion watches you see.
Absolutely ridiculous and completely gopping.
To think I thought my Pelagos was slab-sided!!
I did check a few times to make sure this wasn't some kind of 1 April post...
Sent from my SM-S908B using Tapatalk
It wasn’t designed for people to wear. It’s for watch collectors to keep in a safe.