depends on build quality and design
I don’t know much about the innards of watches and tend to go on looks but is one mechanism more reliable long term or is implementation the main factor?
depends on build quality and design
The ETA / Unitas hand wind mechanisms appear to be very robust, with good long term time keeping.
The ETA autos not so good.
I bought a vintage gold plate Precista pocket watch from the 1970s or 80s - I never knew it's actual age, but there was definitely no service history.
The time keeping and reliability was faultless with the original Unitas movement.
The PRS20 Italian full lume is the same. It has a similar movement and runs faultlessly 14-years since manufacture in 2010 - no problem
The 2x auto ETA mechanisms I have both needed a service well before reaching 10-years old.
Much less to go wrong with a manual wind, I like them a lot
Autos were only designed to keep the mainspring fully wound and hence improve accuracy.
Cheers,
Neil.
I like a manual. You become more involved with your watch.
I think any mechanical (watch) are reliable if it is serviced when needed. I have some hi end (=expensive) pieces. I don’t find them any more reliable than more mundane pieces from 2nd tier brands.
I tend to have a preference for automatics with screw down crown as I spend a bit of time each day in water. Nevertheless I do own others that don’t have screwdown crowns and less wrt so I just take them off before the dip in the pool.
Last edited by MartynJC (UK); 22nd October 2023 at 16:23.
“ Ford... you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.” HHGTTG
I'm probably a bit tired and thought I was reading about car transmissions, started saying PDK...
On watches I like my manual Speedmaster, it's a nice feeling winding it every day. Though I sometimes forget and will look funny in two days with my watch stopped. Generally prefer auto for everyday watches.