Reply With QuoteWhy?
Eddie
I had thought better of Hamilton :(
http://img8.dena.ne.jp/ex82/cb/10/24091 ... 6699_2.jpg
Why?
Eddie
Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".
I really don't see the point of watches where you can't see 25% of the dial :?
The magnifying 'portholes' on the Crystal seem to be a Graham signature. I don't recall seeing them at all before the Swordfish.
The big, elaborate crowns, together with the portholes made me think Graham as soon as I saw it.
Awful.....! :(
Just when I was beginning to like Hamilton.... :( :(
That watch (Frogman chrono) has been out for a few years, mind. The steel version is the same but without the lenses over the counter and date. Not sure why they put those only on the titanium version.Originally Posted by WatchScout
...but what do I know; I don't even like watches!
i thought that was an old hamilton design? been out for years hasn't it?
- though granted the swordfish was almost certainly first.
Oh Dear... :shock:
The original is bad enough without copies :pukeleft:
Martin
I FEEL LIKE I'M DIAGONALLY PARKED IN A PARALLEL UNIVERSE
Whilst not a great fan of Graham's designs, they are unique, so that makes that Hamiliton a very poor copy, which does not work on so many levels. A pity as I normally like most of their offerings.
/vince ..
Looks like they've been going through their bins.
Cheers,
Tim.
To both: My eyes! My eyes! :x
Posting Permissions
