Many brands are starting afresh.
Others revive a name that had disappeared. Panerai and our very own Smiths for example, and there are many.
This is good for the industry, and it’s good for us WIS.
Bremont chose to do away with an existing heritage (which is perfectly fine) but instead of building the brand from scratch decided to fake one. And this is where you create an issue.
Many people will look pass this duplicity and see the watches for what they are, very good but probably overpriced watches.
Others will not, and have a strong reaction against it as illustrated by this thread.
Lovers of the brand are right to point out that the negativity started before the in-house debacle, because it started with this faux-heritage. The fake in-house story just added a new layer of lies.