closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 14 of 19 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 700 of 911

Thread: What’s your unpopular watch opinion?

  1. #651
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North
    Posts
    18,981
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Longblackcoat View Post
    To be honest, nothing AP makes would entice me to spend even a tenth of their RRP on them. They're not as tacky as Richard Mille (obviously) but they're certainly heading in that direction.
    Unpopular watch opinion - Some RM's are phenomenal and id have them in a heartbeat. Particularly some of the sub 40mm offerings.

  2. #652
    Master 50kopek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Hague, Netherlands
    Posts
    1,302
    The best looking Rolex sports watch is the 16570 Explorer II with a black dial.


    (pic stolen of the bulangandsons website)

  3. #653
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    400
    It’s really hard to tell the time on reverse panda chronographs

  4. #654
    Grand Master ryanb741's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    19,837
    More of a fact than an opinion but the Longines logo is the oldest unmodified registered trademark in the world, having been registered with the World International Property Organisation in 1889.

    The winged hourglass logo appears on the caseback of all Longines watches.

  5. #655
    Master Halitosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    West Lothian
    Posts
    1,974
    AP crowns and pushers look like daft little Lego heads

  6. #656
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,595
    Quote Originally Posted by MakeColdplayHistory View Post
    1) I would not wear a Nautilus unless you paid me.
    2) You could not pay me enough to wear an Aquanaut.
    Both sublime watches. Weird view IMO.

  7. #657
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    Both sublime watches. Weird view IMO.
    That's why it's unpopular and he is doing precisely what the OP asked for, so stop picking on him.

  8. #658

    What’s your unpopular watch opinion?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    That's why it's unpopular and he is doing precisely what the OP asked for, so stop picking on him.
    Agree, people seem to have misunderstood the thread.

  9. #659
    Prefer Hardlex over sapphire

  10. #660
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Utrecht, Nederland
    Posts
    2,451
    Date on 5 o clock ruins the watch.

  11. #661
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NW Leics
    Posts
    8,190
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav View Post
    What if you are a girl?
    Compensating for not having one.

  12. #662
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NW Leics
    Posts
    8,190
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    Both sublime watches. Weird view IMO.
    I don't mind Aquanauts, but I do find the Nautilus design ugly and dated. Still. Can't afford one so hey

  13. #663
    Master earlofsodbury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Tether's End, Lincs
    Posts
    4,985
    Quote Originally Posted by robert75 View Post
    Unless its Rolex or Omega nobody really cares what you are wearing, please dont bore people to death with a back story.

    Absolutely - I mean UGH! Poor people and their nobody-at-the-golf-club-recognises-it poor people watch brands - dontcha hate 'em?!

  14. #664
    Grand Master wileeeeeey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    19,264
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    Both sublime watches. Weird view IMO.
    If only there was an appropriate thread where he could voice that unpopular opinion!

  15. #665
    Grand Master Passenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Cartagena, Spain
    Posts
    25,215
    Quote Originally Posted by monogroover View Post
    I don't mind Aquanauts, but I do find the Nautilus design ugly and dated. Still. Can't afford one so hey
    Those sticky out lumps of metal on the case sides makes the watch look like it was inspired by the head of a cyberman.

  16. #666
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,984
    I was a sat in a busy beer and pizza place. At the next table leans over and asks, is that a PRX? He cared. And got to say, the chat you get from someone who recognises a PRX is better than the chat you get from someone who can only recognise a Rolex.

  17. #667
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,984
    Quote Originally Posted by 50kopek View Post
    The best looking Rolex sports watch is the 16570 Explorer II with a black dial.


    (pic stolen of the bulangandsons website)
    Rubbish, the only good-looking Rolex is the 16622

  18. #668
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    13,888
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanb741 View Post
    Quartz (and to a degree Spring Drive) is the only real horological advancement over the past 60 years. Mechanical watch 'progress' is basically rehashing 18th century technology.
    Spring Drive are just quartz with the world's most expensive battery.

  19. #669
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    That's why it's unpopular and he is doing precisely what the OP asked for, so stop picking on him.
    Quote Originally Posted by wileeeeeey View Post
    If only there was an appropriate thread where he could voice that unpopular opinion!
    LOL. “Must try harder.”

  20. #670
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    13,888
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Wallasey Runner View Post
    It would have been the one Mallory was wearing 30 years earlier
    Or perhaps the one Irvine was wearing - which was an Ingersoll Radiolite.
    Last edited by M4tt; 9th September 2023 at 12:18.

  21. #671
    Quote Originally Posted by earlofsodbury View Post
    Absolutely - I mean UGH! Poor people and their nobody-at-the-golf-club-recognises-it poor people watch brands - dontcha hate 'em?!
    Not sure what wealth has to do with it or golf for that matter.

    They are probably the 2 most famous brands out there so when people see what they perceive to be an expensive watch they are generally the brands that come to mind. A simple “No it’s whatever brand” is usually enough rather than the WIS trading places style explanation as to why while it is not it’s just as good if not better.

    About as interesting as people who drone on about cars to people who have no interest in cars.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Modern enamel dials are boring and overpriced.

  22. #672
    Rolex doesn’t make luxury watches. They are good but they are not luxury.

  23. #673
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    boston/zurich
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by MakeColdplayHistory View Post
    1) I would not wear a Nautilus unless you paid me.
    the guide at the Patek museum said the Nautilus was originally an object of widespread derision with people referring to it as Dumbo because of how the "ears" stuck out. maybe it's common knowledge but it was news to me

  24. #674
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokyo Tokei View Post
    Prefer Hardlex over sapphire
    Prefer plexi over sapphire but sapphire over mineral glass.
    Last edited by neuman356; 9th September 2023 at 21:44.

  25. #675
    Craftsman MintG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, England
    Posts
    445
    Grand Seiko produces superior watches to Rolex.

  26. #676
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,984
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanb741 View Post
    Unless I see some medals or a uniform then if you are wearing a military watch you look a bit of a tool.
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanb741 View Post
    WTB CWC 1980 Royal Navy Diver reissue. Preferably one of the versions with some degree of fauxtina.

  27. #677
    Craftsman aamaci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    EK UK
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    Rubbish, the only good-looking Rolex is the 16622
    This!

    A

  28. #678
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,984
    Quote Originally Posted by aamaci View Post
    This!

    A
    REALLY wasn't expecting any agreement with that!

  29. #679
    Craftsman theancientmariner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Newcastle, U.K.
    Posts
    708
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    Both sublime watches. Weird view IMO.
    I actually think that it's a quite a popular view rather than an unpopular view. It's just that anyone who voices that opinion feels as though they'll be ostracised by the Patek loving watch community. Admittedly not as much as someone who doesn't like Rolex.

  30. #680
    Craftsman theancientmariner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Newcastle, U.K.
    Posts
    708
    Quote Originally Posted by robert75 View Post
    Not sure what wealth has to do with it or golf for that matter.
    a touch of sarcasm I believe. Poor people can't afford Omega or Rolex, don't play golf and as a rule of thumb, golf club members are a bunch of snobs. Before anyone has a mild panic attack about that last comment, how many other sports clubs only let you join after being referred by a current member - the it's not what you know you know and how you play, more who you know scenario.

  31. #681
    Grand Master ryanb741's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    19,837
    I meant an actual military (eg issued watch or regimental special edition) as I clarified in a later post as many watches designs are derived from military issue pieces.

    But glad to know I'm living rent-free in your head anyway

  32. #682
    Master Ruggertech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Deepest darkest South Wales.
    Posts
    7,177
    Ploprof. They look like they been cut out of a sheet of plate steel on a bandsaw. By Stevie Wonder.

  33. #683
    Grand Master ryanb741's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    19,837
    Tudor's price point in relation to other Swiss brands is too low. They'd probably increase sales of units sold if their price point was the same as Omega as many luxury buyers are put off by something being perceived as a 'bargain'.

  34. #684
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,595
    Grand Seiko leave me cold.

  35. #685
    Stainless Steel is worthless.

    I’ve read so many comments this week about how a plastic watch is a rip off at £300+ yet 316 stainless steel is worth less than £2 per kilo meaning the amount used in a watch (150g approx) is valued at 30p.

    That’s the biggest marketing con in watchmaking, and we’ve AP to thank for getting that ball rolling.

  36. #686
    Grand Master ryanb741's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    19,837
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisparker View Post
    Stainless Steel is worthless.

    I’ve read so many comments this week about how a plastic watch is a rip off at £300+ yet 316 stainless steel is worth less than £2 per kilo meaning the amount used in a watch (150g approx) is valued at 30p.

    That’s the biggest marketing con in watchmaking, and we’ve AP to thank for getting that ball rolling.
    Don't even get me started on ceramic as a 'premium' material as well!

  37. #687
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,485
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisparker View Post
    Stainless Steel is worthless.

    I’ve read so many comments this week about how a plastic watch is a rip off at £300+ yet 316 stainless steel is worth less than £2 per kilo meaning the amount used in a watch (150g approx) is valued at 30p.

    That’s the biggest marketing con in watchmaking, and we’ve AP to thank for getting that ball rolling.
    But in the watch world a steel watch can be worth more than the same watch made of gold, just think Daytona. Absolute madness, but another piece of nonsense drilled into WIS types, it must be steel or it ain’t a watch.

  38. #688
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    boston/zurich
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Wallasey Runner View Post
    But in the watch world a steel watch can be worth more than the same watch made of gold, just think Daytona. Absolute madness, but another piece of nonsense drilled into WIS types, it must be steel or it ain’t a watch.
    back in the old days James Bond could never afford a gold Submariner on a government salary. these days, for want of a sufficiently lengthy relationship with a dealer, he'd have to settle for one.

    maybe that makes the gold version the modern sports model?

  39. #689
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisparker View Post
    Stainless Steel is worthless.

    I’ve read so many comments this week about how a plastic watch is a rip off at £300+ yet 316 stainless steel is worth less than £2 per kilo meaning the amount used in a watch (150g approx) is valued at 30p.

    That’s the biggest marketing con in watchmaking, and we’ve AP to thank for getting that ball rolling.
    At least they have to invest some machine time (apart from the steel Swatch Irony cases, which are made with a metal injection moulding process).

  40. #690
    Grand Master Passenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Cartagena, Spain
    Posts
    25,215
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisparker View Post
    Stainless Steel is worthless.

    I’ve read so many comments this week about how a plastic watch is a rip off at £300+ yet 316 stainless steel is worth less than £2 per kilo meaning the amount used in a watch (150g approx) is valued at 30p.

    That’s the biggest marketing con in watchmaking, and we’ve AP to thank for getting that ball rolling.
    And the night spent outside on the cobbles to acquire said plastic watch, it's a helluva a price to pay, for any watch, any frippery.

  41. #691
    The Rolex Explorer should just be a dial option under the Oyster Perpetual range. It bares no similarities with the Explorer II and much closer to the OP range in style and size.

  42. #692
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North
    Posts
    18,981
    Blog Entries
    2
    The Explorer is the most boring Rolex.

  43. #693
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    13,888
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by verv View Post
    The Explorer is the most boring Rolex.
    Which is a remarkable achievement.

  44. #694
    All chronographs are poorly designed except for centre minute & second ones. If they had been invented first, people would look at the 'new' 30min unintuitive scale, too small to read subdialled chronographs as if you were introducing the horse to replace the car.

  45. #695
    Legibility is overrated. Most of the time, when I look down at my watch, I have no need to know what the time is.

    Ditto for accuracy.

  46. #696
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,984
    A lot of people in this world would be just as happy buying and selling vintage toenails, as long as they were reassuringly expensive.

  47. #697
    I prefer snowflake hands to mercedes hands

  48. #698
    Master Ruggertech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Deepest darkest South Wales.
    Posts
    7,177
    Quote Originally Posted by McBeardy View Post
    I prefer snowflake hands to mercedes hands
    With you on that.

  49. #699
    Grand Master oldoakknives's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    20,167
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by verv View Post
    The Explorer is the most boring Rolex.
    And too small.
    Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.

  50. #700
    mechanical watches are my grab and go watches.


    Serial accumulators don't exist.

    ...
    BUBI
    @porque.racing

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information