closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 44 of 44

Thread: Daytona or Stocks N shares ISA

  1. #1
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281

    Daytona or Stocks N shares ISA

    That old dilema which should i choose
    Have an Explorer 1 and a Sub, always loved the look of the 116520

    Do like the old 40mm VC Chrono white dial , they are rarer better made but not sure about long term investment

    My logic is if I buy the watch rather then investing it's something i can enjoy which will appreciate...

    Caveat : please don't reply saying buy it for love not investment as both criterion are equally important to me

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,069
    Blog Entries
    2
    Crypto currencies.

  3. #3
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,477
    Okay, ignoring the what suits your tastes best and focusing on potential, the white dial Stainless steel Daytonas have been the better investment in recent years. As we are talking investment, I think you are looking at the worst of the three recent models, the Zenith 16520 is incredibly popular, the new Ceramic also, but the 116520 is the runt of the litter.

    Money in an ISA is a bit boring and probably only returning a few percent at best, having the watch will enable you to either keep it in a safe and enjoy owning it or even better wear it. If it increases in value over time, then great - but no guarantees.

    I would buy that black dial 16520 full set on SC at present - that has potential.

  4. #4
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281
    Thanks for the reply how much is the one on SC ? I can’t access it
    Cheers


    Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app

  5. #5
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,477
    Quote Originally Posted by mhurley View Post
    Thanks for the reply how much is the one on SC ? I can’t access it
    Cheers


    Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
    It has £17.5k in the heading. Full sets are now appearing in London dealers for £20k+.

  6. #6
    Master -Ally-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Eurabia
    Posts
    8,329
    If I had zero savings or investments and zero watches I’d be putting it in to S&S. Beyond that it’s hard to say as everyones circumstances differ.

  7. #7
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    355
    I'd go for the watch

  8. #8
    Grand Master MartynJC (UK)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    12,372
    Blog Entries
    22
    Probably been said before (check the search function) e.g. Zenith Daytona,,, vfm??

    Personally I would never buy a watch as an investment - I would invest in S&S probably in a wrapper ISA or bung it in the pension fund to get the tax break while they are available. Then with any spare cash buy trinkets like watches. I avoid heavy losses by buying second hand (typically). It all depends on your priorities I suppose.

    Martyn

  9. #9
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by mhurley View Post
    That old dilema which should i choose
    Have an Explorer 1 and a Sub, always loved the look of the 116520

    Do like the old 40mm VC Chrono white dial , they are rarer better made but not sure about long term investment

    My logic is if I buy the watch rather then investing it's something i can enjoy which will appreciate...

    Caveat : please don't reply saying buy it for love not investment as both criterion are equally important to me
    Think financial.

    The golden rule is to spread your bets. You need readily accessible cash of say 3 - 6 months wages, You can then spread the rest between stock and shares and physical commodities such as gold, watches, classic cars etc.

    The good news for you is that Daytonas usually sell easily so it's something you can liquidate quickly. However always and I mean always have at least 3 months cash for that inevitable rainy day before you invest.

  10. #10
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Wallasey Runner View Post
    It has £17.5k in the heading. Full sets are now appearing in London dealers for £20k+.
    Bloody hell - I only paid £7750 for my 16520 less than two years ago. I am pleasantly surprised.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    Think financial.

    The golden rule is to spread your bets. You need readily accessible cash of say 3 - 6 months wages, You can then spread the rest between stock and shares and physical commodities such as gold, watches, classic cars etc.

    The good news for you is that Daytonas usually sell easily so it's something you can liquidate quickly. However always and I mean always have at least 3 months cash for that inevitable rainy day before you invest.
    Words to live by.

    That’s how I approached it as my earning power increased:
    Cash first
    Then S&S ISA
    Then alternative investments




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    If buying a Daytona, then 16520s seem to be a better 'investment' than 116520s, although starting prices are higher.

  13. #13
    Master spuds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    Think financial.

    The golden rule is to spread your bets. You need readily accessible cash of say 3 - 6 months wages, You can then spread the rest between stock and shares and physical commodities such as gold, watches, classic cars etc.

    The good news for you is that Daytonas usually sell easily so it's something you can liquidate quickly. However always and I mean always have at least 3 months cash for that inevitable rainy day before you invest.


    Spot On.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Wallasey Runner View Post
    Okay, ignoring the what suits your tastes best and focusing on potential, the white dial Stainless steel Daytonas have been the better investment in recent years. As we are talking investment, I think you are looking at the worst of the three recent models, the Zenith 16520 is incredibly popular, the new Ceramic also, but the 116520 is the runt of the litter.

    Money in an ISA is a bit boring and probably only returning a few percent at best, having the watch will enable you to either keep it in a safe and enjoy owning it or even better wear it. If it increases in value over time, then great - but no guarantees.

    I would buy that black dial 16520 full set on SC at present - that has potential.
    Well the runt of the litter seems to still be doing ok at the moment. WF are asking £18,950 for an unworn 2015 black dial 116520. I seem to recall they had another unworn 116520 a few months ago for a couple of £k less.

  15. #15
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,477
    Quote Originally Posted by gbn13 View Post
    Well the runt of the litter seems to still be doing ok at the moment. WF are asking £18,950 for an unworn 2015 black dial 116520. I seem to recall they had another unworn 116520 a few months ago for a couple of £k less.
    Apologies, didn't mean to totally dismiss it out of hand. Certainly on the white dial version the black Sub rings on the Zenith and the Ceramic give far better visibility at first glance than the steel coloured rings of the 116520. This is of course less of an issue with the Black Dial.

    All three models have gone completely bonkers price wise, but I think the Zenith and Ceramic more so - which was the point I suppose I was trying to make.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Wallasey Runner View Post
    Apologies, didn't mean to totally dismiss it out of hand. Certainly on the white dial version the black Sub rings on the Zenith and the Ceramic give far better visibility at first glance than the steel coloured rings of the 116520. This is of course less of an issue with the Black Dial.

    All three models have gone completely bonkers price wise, but I think the Zenith and Ceramic more so - which was the point I suppose I was trying to make.
    Apologies not required Ken. I agree about the visibility of the Zenith/Ceramic white dial versions and was recently reminded of one that got away!

    Found a business card from a dealer in a jacket that I hadn't worn for ages. On the reverse were the details of the white 16520 I had tried on at the time:
    16/10/15 - Zenith Daytona 1994 £8,250.

    I thought I am not paying that, it's more than the new 116520 I am on a waiting list for.......

    Oh well timing is everything.

  17. #17
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,477
    Quote Originally Posted by gbn13 View Post
    Apologies not required Ken. I agree about the visibility of the Zenith/Ceramic white dial versions and was recently reminded of one that got away!

    Found a business card from a dealer in a jacket that I hadn't worn for ages. On the reverse were the details of the white 16520 I had tried on at the time:
    16/10/15 - Zenith Daytona 1994 £8,250.

    I thought I am not paying that, it's more than the new 116520 I am on a waiting list for.......

    Oh well timing is everything.
    I bought a white dial Zenith from Watches of Distinction in Dec 2016 for £9k dead, sold it on here a few weeks later for the same price. By Aug 17 WF were asking £17k for the same watch - 8 months later.

    I think Mick is in the same boat, only he still has his. That will pay for many a night in the ex-pat bar

  18. #18
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281
    Thanks for all the input
    Prefer white dial to black
    Zenith is out of my price range so would have to be an in house although lookswise the black subdials look better



    Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app

  19. #19
    Master Dr Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,436
    Don't forget that if the Daytona increases in value by a lot, then there may be a capital gains charge when you dispose of it, so there is a tax advantage to the ISA. You can't ISA a watch, but it would be nice if you could.
    I'd still have the Daytona and sod the investment.

  20. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,723
    I dithered on the watch Mick P bought. £7750 for a ‘proper’ P Series 2000 16520 boxed but no papers. Gut feel is he’d sell that on here, with the benefit of the service he had done for £13-15k

    I managed to pick myself up a boxed 1996 mk4 dial in the end.

    The 16520 looks a stellar investment from where I am sitting with the additional bonus of being a great watch to wear.

  21. #21
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,723
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Wolff View Post
    Don't forget that if the Daytona increases in value by a lot, then there may be a capital gains charge when you dispose of it, so there is a tax advantage to the ISA. You can't ISA a watch, but it would be nice if you could.
    I'd still have the Daytona and sod the investment.
    CGT does not apply to ‘wasting assets’ which watches are classed as. You would have have a tax liability if you speculated in a watch as an investment, however if you bought it because you liked it and it just happened to rise in value then you are ok....

  22. #22
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    5,128
    When watches become about 'investment' everything gets distorted. The fun of the hobby is corrupted.

  23. #23
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by paskinner View Post
    When watches become about 'investment' everything gets distorted. The fun of the hobby is corrupted.
    In all fairness, that statement is a two edged sword.

    Some people will buy a Rolex at the drop of a hat because it is not really spending money. You can buy it, wear it and when you tire of it, sell it on, hopefully at break even or at a profit if you are lucky. It becomes, therefore, a non cost hobby.

    Other people see it as distorting the hobby because genuine enthusiasts tend to get pushed out due to the "investors" moving in.

    It is, of course, debatable as to which group are right.

  24. #24
    I personally like my white 116520 though I seldom wear it.

    I just went on WatchFinder to check the latest price on the aforementioned watch. A full set white is listed for £14,950, astonishing! I bought mine a shade under 7k about 20 months ago. I was thinking they were around 10k at the moment!!!

    EDIT - looking through what is available, WF don't actually have that much once you filter out the gold/bi metal stuff. Only one white 116520. So clearly they are hard to come by.
    Last edited by crazyp; 24th February 2018 at 12:17.

  25. #25
    Master murkeywaters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Near the sea
    Posts
    7,131
    I get the impression the OP wants it as an enjoyable investment with some spare cash, whereas some of the replies are talking like its a pension..

    I asked a similar question about 18 months ago about a 5513 as I had a small pension payout, since then the prices have continued to climb so it would have been a sound enjoyable investment, the key though is that this was spare/fun/punt cash not something that will be 100% needed for my retirement, thats a big differnce to money that will be needed for retirement.

  26. #26
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    M62 corridor
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    Bloody hell - I only paid £7750 for my 16520 less than two years ago. I am pleasantly surprised.

    A rise as rapid as that does rather make me concerned that this might be a bubble. It's always difficult to rationalise the market for things like this, The question is, what has changed in two years to more than double (nearly treble?) the price? Or more importantly for a prospective buyer, what's to stop the current price falling?

  27. #27
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    5,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    In all fairness, that statement is a two edged sword.

    Some people will buy a Rolex at the drop of a hat because it is not really spending money.

    .
    The real price is that you get locked into a narrow group of very 'samey' watches. The wider, and interesting , world of watches is lost to you. That's too high a hidden cost to me. No real fun at all.
    And if I want a cost free hobby i'l go out walking in the countryside. Mind you, then you go to the pub, and......
    Last edited by paskinner; 24th February 2018 at 13:16.

  28. #28
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by David_D View Post
    A rise as rapid as that does rather make me concerned that this might be a bubble. It's always difficult to rationalise the market for things like this, The question is, what has changed in two years to more than double (nearly treble?) the price? Or more importantly for a prospective buyer, what's to stop the current price falling?
    Yes I agree, prices have been on a roller lately and it is just not sustainable. It's either going to end in a stabalisation or even a crash for a year or two. However long term, the prices seem to be drifting upwards.

  29. #29
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,118
    Over the last couple of years there have been some spectacular auction results not least the Newman which immediately dragged up the price of all Daytona’s, as long as interest rates stay low the clever money will still get pumped into rare commodities and those guys don’t speculate to lose money.

  30. #30
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Interest rates go up mainly to control inflation and collectible commodities usually do well during inflation. I think there just comes a time when the market says enough is enough.

  31. #31
    Master Bernard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    3,168
    The market for mass produced steel chrono's by Rolex seems like a risky business to me.

    I strongly feel the current price is heavily inflated.

    These watches seem to be going up in price at enormous speed although: 1) they are not that old and; 2) they are not that rare.

    Basically, we aren't talking about a 1965 105.003 Speedmaster, of which only a much smaller number was ever produced.

    I'm afraid that as soon as the market changes (interest goes up), the prices of these pieces might go down fast.

    Just my feeling...

  32. #32
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Jockland
    Posts
    731

    Buying high.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
    The market for mass produced steel chrono's by Rolex seems like a risky business to me.

    I strongly feel the current price is heavily inflated.

    These watches seem to be going up in price at enormous speed although: 1) they are not that old and; 2) they are not that rare.

    Basically, we aren't talking about a 1965 105.003 Speedmaster, of which only a much smaller number was ever produced.

    I'm afraid that as soon as the market changes (interest goes up), the prices of these pieces might go down fast.

    Just my feeling...
    If you are buying not just the Daytona but some of the other Rolex sports at the top end prices that most dealers are asking for, then you may take a big hit when market drop offs. There are some eye watering prices being asked out in the market for what are mass produced in the tens to hundreds of thousands, WF are asking £19k for an unworn 116520, watch club asking nearly £8k for a 114270 or £13k for a fat lady gmt.

    In the short term you are lossing big money on these and even the long game, which will have to be long I believe to make that spend justified if you are looking to get your money back and some.

    The 116520 I believe is overpriced in the current market and like some other sports could well take a downward hit before it levels out at a reduced price.

  33. #33
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    5,827
    Blog Entries
    1
    The chance of a quick buck always lowers the tone in any endeavour...
    Last edited by Montello; 25th February 2018 at 11:13.

  34. #34
    Master bokbok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    sunny yorkshire
    Posts
    3,280
    It's great all talking about watchfinder prices of watches etc what they list for .... 18950 for unworn 116520 on 2015
    They just bid me 8350 to 8550 for 2015 fullset 5 year warranty !!! They said was correct figure as they have 13 steel Daytona in stock.
    So in reality means bugger all


    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

  35. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Flasher View Post

    The 116520 I believe is overpriced in the current market and like some other sports could well take a downward hit before it levels out at a reduced price.
    Which others are you referring to that took downward turns? Maybe the BLNR? But I can't really think of SS Rolex that have had a correction downward, especially with discontinued models.


    Quote Originally Posted by bokbok View Post
    It's great all talking about watchfinder prices of watches etc what they list for .... 18950 for unworn 116520 on 2015
    They just bid me 8350 to 8550 for 2015 fullset 5 year warranty !!! They said was correct figure as they have 13 steel Daytona in stock.
    So in reality means bugger all
    Interesting. We know they try some market manipulation, but this is a very good example of it. Also on how they list on their site, probably holding back stock to drum up interest and price.

  36. #36
    Nobody seems interested in how Daytonas Vs Stocks have done historically...

    You could have bought a Zenith Daytona for about USD $2,300 in 1988. I know nothing about Rolex prices but let's say you could sell that comfortable for, say.... $25,300 = £18,000 apx?

    So you would have made 11x your money buying a Rolex 30 years ago. Don't forget to subtract service costs.

    If you put your money in stocks, (say, the S&P500 index), you would have made more. The S&P500 is at 2750 today, Vs 250 in Jan 1988, but you would have also earned on average 2% a year in Dividends.

    Assuming you reinvested these into the index you would have a total return of 19x your money.

    In conclusion, buy real estate.

  37. #37
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    5,655
    Quote Originally Posted by spluurfg View Post
    Nobody seems interested in how Daytonas Vs Stocks have done historically...

    You could have bought a Zenith Daytona for about USD $2,300 in 1988. I know nothing about Rolex prices but let's say you could sell that comfortable for, say.... $25,300 = £18,000 apx?

    So you would have made 11x your money buying a Rolex 30 years ago. Don't forget to subtract service costs.

    If you put your money in stocks, (say, the S&P500 index), you would have made more. The S&P500 is at 2750 today, Vs 250 in Jan 1988, but you would have also earned on average 2% a year in Dividends.

    Assuming you reinvested these into the index you would have a total return of 19x your money.

    In conclusion, buy real estate.
    Interesting. To take the starting point (1988), I suspect the first fifteen years of that time period had much higher growth in property and stocks than the second half ('03-'18). Happy to be corrected. So is there a long-term slow down in these traditionally high return investments?

    Property tends to require a much bigger outlay so not so easy to incrementally invest, in contrast with watches or stocks. This is a prime example of money going to money i.e. the rich can take advantage of the more lucrative investment opportunities.

    Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

  38. #38
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    5,827
    Blog Entries
    1
    If you have investment property and a reasonable portfolio of shares then why not hold 5% in watches. Seems reasonable and a bit of fun.

    What would be stupid would be to hold 10 to100% of your investment in watches.

    I think recent history is tempting younger buyers on the investment ticket which may not work out.

  39. #39
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281
    Just had another Daytona thought.
    Zenith bi colours appear to be selling for less on eBay than 116520s
    So which makes the better long term investment?


    Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app

  40. #40
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by mhurley View Post
    Just had another Daytona thought.
    Zenith bi colours appear to be selling for less on eBay than 116520s
    So which makes the better long term investment?


    Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
    No one knows the answer to that. A lot of people think TT is plain bloody cheap looking and others like it. At the moment the former out number the latter by a significant degree. However it could change overnight. I suspect that the prejudice against TT is very deeply rooted and it will always be regarded as a bit iffy.

  41. #41
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    New York, London, Dubai
    Posts
    503
    The 16520 & the 116520 will still increase in value simply due the fact that they are no longer on production.

    The Daytona-C 116500 will prob not increase in value by much more, the only real increase will directly correlate to increase/adjustments in the retail price. I can also see the premium % dropping a little on the Daytona-C.

    If the trend of upwards value continues I can see the PM Daytonas holding their values much better as many buyer will begin to see the bang the buck so to speak in PM

  42. #42
    I was faced with a similar decision back when I bought my first Sub many years ago. I wasn't drowning in spare cash but was faced with either dropping £3k into a small savings/investment fund or buying a Sub. I'm very glad I did. There are very few opportunities in life where you can buy something which might give you a small return AND give you pleasure in its ownership and I think one would be silly not to jump at the chance. If only I could make similar decisions with cars :(

    There's always the chance to to some mental gymnastics when it comes to selling it a few years down the line which makes it easier justifying it: lost a little money on it? - who cares, you bought it for the enjoyment and had many £££s worth of pleasure through owning and wearing it; had some capital appreciation? You're an investment genius.

  43. #43
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Washington , England
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by gbn13 View Post
    Apologies not required Ken. I agree about the visibility of the Zenith/Ceramic white dial versions and was recently reminded of one that got away!

    Found a business card from a dealer in a jacket that I hadn't worn for ages. On the reverse were the details of the white 16520 I had tried on at the time:
    16/10/15 - Zenith Daytona 1994 £8,250.

    I thought I am not paying that, it's more than the new 116520 I am on a waiting list for.......

    Oh well timing is everything.


    Bought my Daytona brand new from an AD after being on the waiting list , paid £3670 which was list price at the time , had to justify the purchase to both myself and the dragon at the time .

    As you said timing is everything....

  44. #44
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    CUMBRIA
    Posts
    1,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
    No one knows the answer to that. A lot of people think TT is plain bloody cheap looking and others like it. At the moment the former out number the latter by a significant degree. However it could change overnight. I suspect that the prejudice against TT is very deeply rooted and it will always be regarded as a bit iffy.
    I think a lot of people will be looking at the Two-Tone as they look good value for money currently and are not as unfashionable as they once were.

    Cannot believe the current prices asked for the SS Zeniths !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information