closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: Submariner Service price shock

  1. #1
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281

    Submariner Service price shock

    So I decided to treat my 1997 14060 Submariner to a service. I had no service history with the watch so decided to take it in to a well known high street chain
    The salesman said "ah you've got a classic model there so the service charge will be £740"
    Classic in his book were the exposed lug holes
    He showed me his price tariffs and there are two prices , one for non classic (£520) and one for classic (£740)
    I was expecting a figure of around £500 so was rather shocked at the price
    I got home and rang Rolex St James , she asked what model i had and what year it was and their initial quote was £485 but then she did say that it could be £710 if it was determined to be a classic model
    She didn't seem to know what the criterion was for "classic".
    I'm hoping once Rolex receive my watch they will tweak the price if they determine it is "non classic"
    Last edited by mhurley; 8th December 2017 at 12:32.

  2. #2
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    135
    they want to charge £255 to clean your lug holes! wow

  3. #3
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,958
    Maybe you've stumbled upon a good definition of "vintage": the point at which you get fleeced for servicing.

  4. #4
    I thought that the basic way Rolex distinguish if a model falls into the standard service tariffs, or the more expensive "classic" is whether it is a model fitted with a sapphire crystal, or an older model with plexi.

  5. #5
    Craftsman Go Big's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    921
    Quote Originally Posted by Seang View Post
    they want to charge £255 to clean your lug holes! wow
    My mother used to do mine for free!


    Sent from my SM-G935F using TZ-UK mobile app

  6. #6
    Around £470 is the actual cost charged by my AD, with additional items as required (e.g. crown, glass, etc) attracting further costs.

  7. #7
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    3,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Seang View Post
    they want to charge £255 to clean your lug holes! wow
    Well ear syringing is an involved process and can be painful if done clumsily.

  8. #8
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281
    I've sent an email to the high street stores general address

    Hi, i dropped my Submariner off for a service today at Cardiff WOS.
    The chap i spoke to said it was a “Classic model” and the cost would be the upper tariff of £740
    I rang Rolex St James when i got home and they quoted me the cheaper tariff of £485
    Can you confirm once Rolex receive my watch and determine if it is "non classic" that i wont be charged the “Classic" price

  9. #9
    Grand Master Saint-Just's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ashford, Kent
    Posts
    28,999
    A 'classic' for them could be a Rolex fitted with Plexi. In which case you're safe. Or it could be one with a tritium dial. In which case you're probably not.
    'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.

  10. #10
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    manchester, UK
    Posts
    288
    lug holes seems like an odd discriminator. plenty what i would call modern subs with them

  11. #11
    Grand Master Onelasttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Everywhere, yet nowhere...
    Posts
    13,798
    What difference does the glass material or the lume chemistry make to how they service the movement? Exactly what do they do differently for the extra £250?

  12. #12
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Padders View Post
    Well ear syringing is an involved process and can be painful if done clumsily.
    Harley Street Hearing have the tiny vacuum cleaners and charge £80 if you can't be bothered with the 10 days of faffing around before your local surgery nurse wields the automated squirter.

  13. #13
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    Harley Street Hearing have the tiny vacuum cleaners and charge £80 if you can't be bothered with the 10 days of faffing around before your local surgery nurse wields the automated squirter.
    As does Clean Ear Clinic, 80quid is a small price to pay in order not to have me ears syringed ever again (how is this on topic BTW?).

  14. #14
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,412
    Duncan at Genesis quoted me £350 for a full 14060m movement service a few months back. I would avoid the High Street ADs if I was you.

  15. #15
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,405
    My understanding was always that it's the crystal the defines the service cost. That's what I've previously been told directly by Rolex anyway. Sounds like the AD is a bit clueless

  16. #16
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparjar View Post
    (how is this on topic BTW?).
    Showing that humans lug holes are cheaper to deal with than Rolex ones?

  17. #17
    You've made two basic mistakes.

    You took your watch to "a High Street Retailer" for a service quote.

    You started a post with "So".

    Neither of which is forgivable.

  18. #18
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    1,897
    Quote Originally Posted by Onelasttime View Post
    What difference does the glass material or the lume chemistry make to how they service the movement? Exactly what do they do differently for the extra £250?
    When my 1966 GMT was Rolex serviced as a Classic I was advised that these are serviced by one watchmaker, rather then the "conveyor belt" system they now use for the newer models. Sounds plausible although whether you think it's worth it, (including the free disclaimer on waterproofing) is a personal thing. I thought it worthwhile for this one but vast majority of the time my watches go to Duncan at Genesis.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Onelasttime View Post
    What difference does the glass material or the lume chemistry make to how they service the movement? Exactly what do they do differently for the extra £250?
    Maybe it's because they used to make a lot on replacement dials before there was so much value in the originals so what they're doing differently is making less money?

  20. #20
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    896
    A classic ? The 14060 still had lug holes in 2010 !

  21. #21
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    4,092
    Quote Originally Posted by boundary546 View Post
    A classic ? The 14060 still had lug holes in 2010 !
    Worse still my 14060M was afflicted with them in 2012! If only I had known.............

  22. #22
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Scotland!
    Posts
    1,067
    That all seems a bit haphazard for a company like Rolex. Is that normal? I'd have expected such things to be made very clear with dealers (unless dealers are free to profiteer if they see the chance?

  23. #23
    Master endo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,259
    Quote Originally Posted by gbn13 View Post
    I thought that the basic way Rolex distinguish if a model falls into the standard service tariffs, or the more expensive "classic" is whether it is a model fitted with a sapphire crystal, or an older model with plexi.
    That's correct, In my experience since i've had a fair few different subs/sd moden and vintage serviced by RSC over the past few years.

    "Classic" = Plexi
    Modern = Sapphire

    Sapphire models also get turned around in half the time of the Plexi models.

  24. #24
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,513
    Quote Originally Posted by Onelasttime View Post
    What difference does the glass material or the lume chemistry make to how they service the movement? Exactly what do they do differently for the extra £250?
    Think about it: it's not the holes or the glass material that's the issue, it's the age of the watch that's the significant factor. I`m guessing that Rolex are charging more for watches that are 20 yrs old?....that's the only rational explanation I can see.

    I really disagree with the 'menu pricing' approach. OK, a 20 yr old watch is likely to need more parts, particularly if it's been neglected, but I think the cost should be set on an individual basis. One 1997 watch can be in poor condition whilst another can be excellent. Furthermore, if an older watch has been Rolex serviced a couple of times I`d expect it to be in decent condition and certainly better than the 'never ben serviced' example.

    My advice is to send the watch to a Rolex accredited Indy, but don`t be surprised if they've been instructed to operate a similar charging system.

    It would be interesting to hear more on this issue and to get confirmation that Rolex are basing the price on the age. It would also be interesting to get an explanation from RSC to justify this.

    Paul

    Edit: On the subject of lugholes, the cold weather's playing havoc with my right ear. Had a perforated eardrum as a kid, right lug's never been perfect since.
    Last edited by walkerwek1958; 8th December 2017 at 19:58.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by endo View Post
    That's correct, In my experience since i've had a fair few different subs/sd moden and vintage serviced by RSC over the past few years.

    "Classic" = Plexi
    Modern = Sapphire

    Sapphire models also get turned around in half the time of the Plexi models.
    Having checked with my AD this is 100% correct.

  26. #26
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    3,410
    The normal distinction is plexi/sapphire. There's also movement specific ones, like the 2135, where an older model needs to have essentially the whole dial side date mechanism replaced and updated, and as such incurrs extra costs because of the sheer number of parts needed.

    For plexi models they usually include the plexi, and also need updating to newest crown and tube type, as well as reverser wheels and other bits and bobs... Rolex have done significant upgrades through the years on all their movements.


    But calling a 14060 a classic is borderline imo, perhaps if it contains a 3000 movement, i.e not a 14060M reference. But still, theres fewer parts to replace as no date mechanism in it, and quicker to service therefore... They're ripping you off if you pay £740, thats Daytona price service costs....

  27. #27
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,552
    Blog Entries
    6
    Oh God, I can Imagine the sc pitches:
    For Sale, Rolex 16600, part of the Classic range...

    With regards the ear Hoover, do you need to use olive oil for a couple of weeks first?

  28. #28
    Grand Master Wallasey Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Wirral - North West England
    Posts
    15,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave O'Sullivan View Post
    Oh God, I can Imagine the sc pitches:
    For Sale, Rolex 16600, part of the Classic range...

    With regards the ear Hoover, do you need to use olive oil for a couple of weeks first?
    If they are classic, they must be worth more

  29. #29
    Grand Master Foxy100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Die Fuchsröhre
    Posts
    14,943
    My Exp2 is going to be due a service in the next few years and it's going straight to Duncan Potter.
    "A man of little significance"

  30. #30
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    459
    Quote Originally Posted by 744ER View Post
    The normal distinction is plexi/sapphire. There's also movement specific ones, like the 2135, where an older model needs to have essentially the whole dial side date mechanism replaced and updated, and as such incurrs extra costs because of the sheer number of parts needed.

    For plexi models they usually include the plexi, and also need updating to newest crown and tube type, as well as reverser wheels and other bits and bobs... Rolex have done significant upgrades through the years on all their movements.


    But calling a 14060 a classic is borderline imo, perhaps if it contains a 3000 movement, i.e not a 14060M reference. But still, theres fewer parts to replace as no date mechanism in it, and quicker to service therefore... They're ripping you off if you pay £740, thats Daytona price service costs....
    Spot on.
    Plus on something like the 2135 if it has not been regularly serviced then the great wheel, barrel and balance staff may need replacing to get the movement to spec. Especially when checking results after 24 hours.

  31. #31
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave O'Sullivan View Post
    With regards the ear Hoover, do you need to use olive oil for a couple of weeks first?
    No, you just make your booking, hand over your eighty quid and off they go. After years and years of olive oil it's bliss

  32. #32
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    Think about it: it's not the holes or the glass material that's the issue, it's the age of the watch that's the significant factor. I`m guessing that Rolex are charging more for watches that are 20 yrs old?....that's the only rational explanation I can see.

    I really disagree with the 'menu pricing' approach. OK, a 20 yr old watch is likely to need more parts, particularly if it's been neglected, but I think the cost should be set on an individual basis. One 1997 watch can be in poor condition whilst another can be excellent. Furthermore, if an older watch has been Rolex serviced a couple of times I`d expect it to be in decent condition and certainly better than the 'never ben serviced' example.

    My advice is to send the watch to a Rolex accredited Indy, but don`t be surprised if they've been instructed to operate a similar charging system.

    It would be interesting to hear more on this issue and to get confirmation that Rolex are basing the price on the age. It would also be interesting to get an explanation from RSC to justify this.

    Paul

    Edit: On the subject of lugholes, the cold weather's playing havoc with my right ear. Had a perforated eardrum as a kid, right lug's never been perfect since.
    I will keep you posted. I've had a rough estimate of watch being ready early feb

  33. #33
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    Maybe you've stumbled upon a good definition of "vintage": the point at which you get fleeced for servicing.

  34. #34
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by td1596 View Post
    lug holes seems like an odd discriminator. plenty what i would call modern subs with them
    Indeed. Later four line 14060m examples have the modern blue hairspring and other such updates. They're also much newer than an old modern ceramic gmt2.

  35. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post

    Edit: On the subject of lugholes, the cold weather's playing havoc with my right ear. Had a perforated eardrum as a kid, right lug's never been perfect since.
    Can you not get your lug holes re drilled?

    Sent from my SM-G930F using TZ-UK mobile app

  36. #36
    Had my 1997 Sub serviced only 10 days ago or so at a cost of £440~. As has been said multiple times on already, the model is not a 'vintage' by any stretch. The service centres I spoke to didn't even try to claim it was.

  37. #37
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    1,522
    I recently had my 14060m from 2005 serviced at Watch Doctors in Tring for £320 following a broken mainspring.

  38. #38
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Winchester
    Posts
    2,205
    I had my 2004 SD with lug holes serviced through St James' RSC recently. £475 and 3 week turnaround, great service

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information