Reply With QuoteHonest answer is that I don't know, but you can check the selling prices of both watches and factor in how desirable the trade is to you. Trades often come down to both sides being happy with the deal.
Good luck if you go for it.
I’m struggling to find consistent example prices so I’d genuinely be interested in opinion here. A 2012 Panerai 112 on leather for a 2014 IWC Aquatimer 376704 on bracelet. I’m considering an even trade. Sound reasonable?
Thanks everyone.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Honest answer is that I don't know, but you can check the selling prices of both watches and factor in how desirable the trade is to you. Trades often come down to both sides being happy with the deal.
Good luck if you go for it.
If you're getting the Panerai then go for it! Other way round not-so-much.
I'm not a huge fan of that particular IWC so for me I'd stick with the Panerai unless you're receiving some cash on top.
SecondedOriginally Posted by troymcclure72
quick check on chrono24 and they are similar value, so down to what you prefer really. I do find the lack of bracelet for the Panerai a bit limiting though and as much as i like the Aquatimer over the Pan, think i would rather save a bunch of cash and go for a non chorine version.
if the pam is coming your way then go for it!
Panerai all the way. That IWC was never that popular and already looks dated.
Personally I would take the Panerai, even if it meant adding cash. The Aquatimer looks a bit of a mash-up!
Sent from my iPad using TZ-UK mobile app
Thirded
When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........
If you're happy with the trade then do it. That's all that matters.
Saying that, the person getting the Panerai is getting the better deal here in pure watch terms. Value terms I haven't the foggiest.
All very much appreciated. Thanks all, decision made: PAM going on the wrist. :)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I have No ideas of the values but I would rather have the IWC any day.
Posting Permissions