So basically, alpha males prefer big watches, wimps wear small watches.
From The Times this morning:
An interesting theory, though clearly many other forces are at work. A small platinum watch may speak louder than a large Diesel watch in the boardroom! A stylish choice may be more 'powerful', and those who constantly attempt to signal 'social dominance' get called some pretty colourful names behind their back. There's no denying though that in the world of cars, the scowling LED eyebrows of an Audi R8 do seem to signal intent when one suddenly appears behind you on the motorway.How a big watch could help you win in a face-off
A psychological link between wide faces and social dominance may be the reason why some people prefer road-hogging cars and large chunky watches, a study has claimed.
People typically shy away from somebody who has a wide face because it is perceived as threatening. But a “wide face” superimposed on consumer products, such as cars, could be a useful way of signalling that you are a powerful person, say psychologists.
To test the theory, scientists conducted experiments in which participants selected preferred photos of products whose design could conceivably resemble a human face, such as clocks, watches and cars.
While looking at the pictures, the volunteers were asked to imagine different scenarios including an encounter with a school bully, a friendly family get-together or a tricky business trip.
In situations when appearing dominant was an advantage they tended to choose a wider product design. In scenarios where there was no need to project dominance the width of the product became less important.
Dr Ahreum Maeng, from the University of Kansas School of Business in the US, who co-led the study, said: “When it comes to a dominant-looking product face, [the study’s subjects] really like it. It’s probably because people view the product as part of themselves and they would think I can demonstrate my dominance through the product’.
“These kinds of things are automatically going on in people’s brains. When we see those shapes resembling a human face in the product design, we can’t help but perceive it that way.”
Recent work has shown that certain product designs can signal specific personality traits, the scientists wrote in the Journal of Consumer Research.
This ties in with The Times' other August silly season watch story, when psychologists discovered to their amazement the 'secret' that watches are usually set to ten past ten in adverts, supposedly because the watch appears to be 'smiling'. I guess they'd never spent 2 minutes trying to find a reasonable alternative.
So basically, alpha males prefer big watches, wimps wear small watches.
👍
Sent from my SM-J320FN using TZ-UK mobile app
I always thought it was a fashion thing, people who like big watches today have the same mentality as those who liked platform shoes, mullets, shoulder pads, etc.
Professional footballers tend to wear overly large, expensive watches. Says everything really.
List of wimps with girlie wrists:
Itsguy
Number2
Bob Mc
SimonK
WHL1882
Wouldn't wearing a smaller watch make your hands and arms look bigger.
I know, I was joking... but on my skinny wrist 40mm genuinely is on the large side, it's all relative as they say.
Certainly in decades past a 40mm sports Rolex would have fitted the 'large' description of The Times article and may have come across as pretty macho, less so now...
Yes, it's about the only plausible place to put them without covering something up and having it look unbalanced really. You could also point them downwards creating a 'sad face' but apart from that issue, it would be more like 4.37 creating a more acute angle than 10.10, that hides writing again. I'm stunned that this ended up as 'news' in the Times even in August, and that anyone had bothered to 'research' the bleeding obvious, but the clock on their masthead is set to 4.30 rather unusually (when the first edition used be printed) so I guess the have an interest.
Last edited by Itsguy; 23rd August 2017 at 18:09.
So, is there any information from the study as to what watches would be considered large?
I'm now wearing a Speedmaster Pro on a strap. Is that too big? I also have watches of 36mm.
Does that mean that I'm exercising dominance since coming home from work, as I changed from a 38mm to the Pro?
Confused.
Social Dominance must be such hard work. Just thinking about it makes me feel weary.
Does the article offer any stylistic cues for budding misanthropes such as myself?
So what's the situation if you wear a 46mm Airman 17 on wrists like a capuchin monkey's?
er.. I'm asking for a friend of course.
This needs to be in the Pit so I can swear a lot.
What a waste of crank-witted, psycho-toss babble money these 'studies' are. It's all down to good taste - some people have it, some people get it from crank-witted, psycho-toss babble 'studies' in Tory toss rag media publications.
I think that's clean enough for WT?
Last edited by Onelasttime; 23rd August 2017 at 21:58.
Some people just like larger watches.
Size Police are out then hahaha get over yourselves.
Actually I think my wrist is fairly average at 7.25" I just don't need a large watch or a flash car as a penis extension.
Sent from my SM-J320FN using TZ-UK mobile app
Surely to god there's enough actual news without studies like this being reported on? Whoever commissioned the research needs their head examined.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Deleted
Last edited by Analogue; 15th September 2017 at 02:55.
'Hahaha.......get over yourselves'
If that's the limits of your ability to contribute to a debate you have my sympathies.
The English language is a versatile tool for self expression if it's used correctly........give it a try and you might get good at it eventually.
Large watches is a fashion that appears to be here to stay, but unless you've got big wrists you end up looking like you've tied a clock to your wrist,or you look like a child wearing dad's watch.
Like you said, some folks like big watches.
Paul
Last edited by walkerwek1958; 23rd August 2017 at 23:48.
So much wrong with this study (let alone the objectionable idea of social dominance) it's hard to know where to begin.
How does a watch face look like a human face, particularly when viewed obliquely by someone other than the wearer?
Also, note how the author takes the apparent findings (people prefer fatter products when thinking of unpleasant scenarios such as school bullies, and prefer thinner products when thinking of pleasant scenarios such as family get togethers) and radically distorts them, claiming “When it comes to a dominant-looking product face, [the study’s subjects] really like it." That is the precise opposite of what his report data appear to show.
I wonder who funded this study? Manufacturers of scowly, po-faced repmobiles and lumpen "luxury" watches.
The eyes are not here
There are no eyes here
In this valley of dying stars
In this hollow valley
This broken jaw of our lost kingdoms
Not with a bang, but with a whimper
etc
I am about to pick up a few Invicta and Diesel watches. This Diesel Grandaddy should do the trick!
I do apologise for not being up to your literary standards,as you would seem to be in the small watch camp then you would appear prefer them which is fine.
My point you so well missed in your rush to be superior is that watches like many things are down to opinions and that yours is not necessarily right, but just like everyone else you have one.
Thanks again for your superb dexterity of the English vernacular,I am off to practice my self expression in the vain hope that maybe one day I match your towering standards of literary genius.
As I said some of you need to get over yourselves..........................
From my experience, all the watch owners sub 40mm and under tend to be under 5'10", in dead end jobs, a little skint, drive old cars and lose their partners to bigger watch wearers. And they tend to ridicule those who choose to wear watches above that size.
You are clearly a superior being.
Sent from my SM-J320FN using TZ-UK mobile app
Last edited by Bob Mc; 24th August 2017 at 09:45.
I think the clue is in his user name...
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
I don't know about large watches and social dominance but there always seems some kind of relationship between small watches and insecurity. And that is evidenced in the comments. Sarky is obviously being sarcastic but he is using the same trope that the small watch brigade usually do.
I am not sure why people can't accept that people wear big or small watches because they like them without trying to
ascirbe motive or find explanations or apply woodoo science.