On another forum I use there's an interesting thread about replica watches, including some pictures of some (genuine looking to me) watches. Always surprises me how many people want them, personally I don't see the point.
http://forums.m3cutters.co.uk/showthread.php?t=181869
Yes too many fakes about that look like the real thing!
Some guy tried to sell me a fake Rolex, little did he know that I know a bit about watches, I told him to stick his "comex" were the sun don't shine!
re: bswatch.cn link some of those look far too good for cheap reps, I'll bet the pics aren't legit. I've owned a couple many years ago, they were OK but never feel special as you know they're not the real deal.
Uh-oh.
R
Ignorance breeds Fear. Fear breeds Hatred. Hatred breeds Ignorance. Break the chain.
Murdoc this won't end well.
Simon
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmmmmmm.....
I don't see the problem discussing this subject. Just talking about doesn't mean one will be tempted to rush out and buy. This isn't 'fight club' (no, belay that, I've just remembered the 911 thread)
Tbh any info that will prevent someone being stitched up over a replica watch or anything false for that matter is useful.
I find some of these so-called 'homage watches' a bit bizarre fwiw.
I looked at the site in your link and now I feel like I should have a shower. Some of them look very real and that just makes it even dirtier.
It is all wrong , just imagine though five weeks or five months down the line ...weird rotor noises, being out by seconds then minutes eventually hours. It's a pity as aesthetically people will look at pieces such as the comex, the original explorer and mil sub and be tempted on pure aesthetics. It's a sin, a real dirty sin by these manufacturers pulling on people's interest -such is the counterfeit business
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some of the crap though .. rolex sub Tiffany edition, rolex sub mastermind edition - ridiculous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If one wanted to be absolutely purist, one could argue that many of today's watches are fakes. I mean do Omega make their own movements ? Or Patek ? Or Breitling ? Or IWC ?
Many others.
You are buying their name. Not their product.
Brendan
I think you are muddying the waters unnecessarily. You can argue about what goes into an Omega, but the Omega was either made by Omega, or it was made by someone else and labelled as an Omega. Omega has the right to do that the other doesn't. The first is a genuine Omega, the second is a fake. It really is that simple.
Now, if you have an issue with what goes into an Omega made by Omega, that's an entirely different discussion.
My Replay jeans have a YKK zip, does that make them fake?
And don't start me on the VAG engine in my VW van...
Some of these fake watches contain swiss made ETA movements, the same as Tudor and many others. I'm surprised there has never been a fake Tudor or maybe there has.
Read this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_made
Brendan
I know what you're saying. What I'm saying is that if a watch is made by Omega, it's not fake.
And if it's not made by Omega, but pretends to be, it's a fake.
This is pretty much the exact definition of what "fake" means.
No need to be prickly, I am disagreeing with you in a perfectly civil manner.That's all.
Take it or leave it.
One of the 'best' fakes out there is the Pelagos.
I don't know why people get their knickers in a twist about linking to this stuff. The post I quoted here says people really need to be checking this info out IMO. I like to keep abreast of it all myself, think it's good to know how astute you need to be about it.
I think people would be surprised how good some of these are now. And I'm not talking about the rubbish ones people use on YouTube videos to show the differences!
I understand that. Sorry if I sounded prickly. Unintended.
I haven't got the energy to get into an argument. All I'm saying is that Omega are selling their brand, as are many others, without making all the components. Even assembling their watches in China with Chinese components.
I did say 'if you want to be purist'.
I'm not criticising the industry for trying to save money.
Only 60% of a Swiss watch needs to be Swiss for it to be called Swiss Made.
That's what I mean by take it or leave it.
It's a fact.
Brendan
Yes, they're the rules rightly or wrongly.
It still doesn't make them fakes. The definition of a fake has been stated twice already and an Omega with an ETA movement 40% manufactured in China is still a genuine Omega.
I still don't see the point you're trying to make.
Not really as I've no interest in buying a new Omega anytime soon.
I'm just trying to understand what your issue is. The situation hasn't changed in a number of years.
My take on the matter.
Original - manufactured and sold by the original retailer.
OEM - manufactured by the original supplier and identical to that supplied to the original retailer.
Fake = something made using aftermarket and/or non original parts and then sold with the intention to fool a punter.
Homage - something which is designed to look like an original item, but not sold as an original.
Replica - a facsimile of an original, which may or may not contain original/OEM parts but not sold as a original.
Counterfeit - see Fake.
Personally I only have an issue with fakes and counterfeits.
Whoever does not know how to hit the nail on the head should be asked not to hit it at all.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Whoever does not know how to hit the nail on the head should be asked not to hit it at all.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Anything bearing a manufacturers logo but not made by the manufacturer is a fake.
When I've seen people refer to Replicas they're fakes.
When they refer to homages then it's typically a copy of the design but without the manufacturers logo.