closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 88 of 88

Thread: Richard Mille - What are your thoughts?

  1. #51
    Craftsman thefatboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In the pub
    Posts
    366
    I like the diver, I think it's the RM028, it's a bit like a very expensive Monster!

    If I had that kind of money though, I'd buy a Datograph.

  2. #52
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,254
    They are certainly a Marmite brand it would seem and when you enter this tier of Horology, there is a lot of choice. They'll be a few in Monaco this weekend at the F1 that's for sure.

  3. #53
    The thread "60 years of the DD" makes me realise just what these "marmite" brands are up against. If they have no classics to reinterpret they are inevitably going to have to make something new.

    I do see that the designs may not be around in 60 years but then again neither will I be !

  4. #54
    Master bobbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Leicester, England
    Posts
    9,614
    New Nadal RM.








    With "CR*P" written all the way through the middle.





  5. #55
    If bought used resale vals seem good

  6. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by proby24 View Post
    Up there with Franck Muller, the 'watch-maker' who puts part of the Titanic in his watches, and Jacob & Co. in the grotesque stakes.
    It would help if you had a clue as to what you are talking about. Even once.

  7. #57
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,254
    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post
    It is an exaggeration. I have an RM 10. Really not an issue at all.
    Any photos/wrist shots of your RM as it would be interesting to see?

  8. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by stix View Post
    Any photos/wrist shots of your RM as it would be interesting to see?









    upload pics

  9. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post
    That looks a lot easier to read than the majority of RMs as there is a clear contrast between the hands and the movement.

  10. #60
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,254
    Thanks and looks very nice mate and easy on the eye. Not as busy as I had anticipated.

  11. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by stix View Post
    Thanks and looks very nice mate and easy on the eye. Not as busy as I had anticipated.
    Thanks

  12. #62
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,239
    That's a rm005 white gold you posted.

  13. #63
    Master Scrubnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    At large in the West Country, UK
    Posts
    2,639



    Amazing, but I can't get my head round the pricing!

  14. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by ibby7 View Post
    That's a rm005 white gold you posted.
    Yes , it is 05 not 10. My bad.
    Always make that mistake.

  15. #65
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by proby24 View Post
    ...the 'watch-maker' who puts part of the Titanic in his watches...
    Is that some Bremont LE I'm not familiar with?

  16. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
    Is that some Bremont LE I'm not familiar with?
    Romain Jerome

  17. #67
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,287
    Blog Entries
    1
    Heres my RM005 that I sold in 2009 - for £15k. I sold it to Blowers, it was the first one they had in. Cheapest I can see now for this model is £37k - would have been a good investment. For me Its maybe worth £15k now but I don`t see £37k there, it was a nice well finished watch. But the base models like my former watch have Vaucher movements, I can see more value in the more complicated Renaud & Papi movement models even through they are even more so stratospheric priced.








  18. #68

  19. #69
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,254
    Quote Originally Posted by xdonolix View Post
    Heres my RM005 that I sold in 2009 - for £15k. I sold it to Blowers, it was the first one they had in. Cheapest I can see now for this model is £37k - would have been a good investment. For me Its maybe worth £15k now but I don`t see £37k there, it was a nice well finished watch. But the base models like my former watch have Vaucher movements, I can see more value in the more complicated Renaud & Papi movement models even through they are even more so stratospheric priced.
    Wow that's nice and a veritable bargain compared to todays prices. Do you regret selling it or it just wasn't for you?

  20. #70
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Aylesbury
    Posts
    2,352
    IMHO The absolute essence of a watch however it is designed or adorned is to read the time easily. It's the sole function. Could I read the time easily on a Richard Millle? Answer is no. Therefor if I had the cash (I don't) it would go on something else.

  21. #71
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Aberdeen. Scotland
    Posts
    1,591
    Blog Entries
    1
    I'm not really qualified to criticise RM watches as I've never owned one or handled any, but this one is really nice




    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post

  22. #72
    Master Scrubnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    At large in the West Country, UK
    Posts
    2,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Devonian View Post
    Did you read the comments? The world's most expensive G Shock.....! I wonder how he justifies the price though?

  23. #73
    When you go high end then go bonkers - RM fits that category. Personally I'd buy an MBA&F. The brand was super friendly at the show I saw their watches and have an additional wow factor over RM in my opinion.

  24. #74
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    276
    I like them, something different, but im afraid they are way out of the price range.

  25. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post
    It would help if you had a clue as to what you are talking about. Even once.
    With a watch collection spanning over 20 years and 200+ watches I think I know exactly what I am talking about.

    Not everyone wants oversized watches that look like they have come out of a Christmas cracker. Not everyone needs, or wants, a 46mm watch to shout 'look how much money I have' to all and sundry. Discretion is a virtue.

    Taste cannot be bought, or taught, my friend.

  26. #76
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,254
    Quote Originally Posted by proby24 View Post
    With a watch collection spanning over 20 years and 200+ watches I think I know exactly what I am talking about.

    Not everyone wants oversized watches that look like they have come out of a Christmas cracker. Not everyone needs, or wants, a 46mm watch to shout 'look how much money I have' to all and sundry. Discretion is a virtue.

    Taste cannot be bought, or taught, my friend.
    It's all subjective at the same time and not all RM's are as you describe plus, I am fairly certain that Frank Muller was and is a respectable watchmaker who didn't utilise any parts from the Titanic, but Roman Jerome did? I also fail to see a correlation between RM and Jacob in any shape or form, primarily as they are a quartz based manufacturer.

  27. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by proby24 View Post
    Not everyone wants oversized watches that look like they have come out of a Christmas cracker. Not everyone needs, or wants, a 46mm watch to shout 'look how much money I have' to all and sundry. Discretion is a virtue.

    Taste cannot be bought, or taught, my friend.
    But I do wonder how many people outside the WIS community know what RM looks like lets alone value!

    A Rolex will more likely show to the masses 'look how much money I have' do you not think?

    Taste is an individual thing so one man poison is another man's pleasure, there's nothing tasteless about RM unless you need to declare its value to like you say all and sundry then that act is tasteless not the watch!

  28. #78
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,842
    They are a very interesting piece and once you buy for the right preowned money they will always be ok residually. The one to have is the RM11 in Rose Gold for me its a great looker but will not be appreciated by the masses but the masses aren’t wearing this watch! Expect long servicing and repair times but theres nothing quite like an RM once you have it on just feels unique and special but not in the nasty way that Jacobs do albeit thats like comparing apples with rotton figs
    RIAC

  29. #79
    Not something I can afford or would wear out and about.

    Although I love some of the Richard Mille watches and I like Richard Mille as a person, seems a great chap and very interesting.

  30. #80
    Grand Master VDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Whitehole
    Posts
    18,967
    Amazing watches and very well made IMO
    Fas est ab hoste doceri

  31. #81
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrubnut View Post
    Did you read the comments? The world's most expensive G Shock.....! I wonder how he justifies the price though?
    Probably not, though I myself always appreciate commitment to shock resistance - grossly overlooked in comparison to water resistance IMO, so more power to Richard Mille there.

  32. #82
    Grand Master Dave+63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    16,040
    I actually quite like the case design and would happily wear one if the dial was legible and the price was lower.

  33. #83
    Master Tony-GB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    3,724
    I couldn't wear a watch called Dick Mille.

  34. #84
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North
    Posts
    18,981
    Blog Entries
    2
    I like and admire them. The design work and finish is something else.

    But, they're the polar opposite to my tastes.

  35. #85
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    289
    Great watches to end finishing in the flesh but can look a bit plastic in pictures

  36. #86
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    2,865
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    That looks a lot easier to read than the majority of RMs as there is a clear contrast between the hands and the movement.
    My thought too

  37. #87
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,594
    I was watching The Late Late Show last night, and noticed Ed Sheeran was wearing an 030 limited edition. I have to say that I'd LOVE to own one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information