closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Hommage to an Explorer 2

  1. #1

    Hommage to an Explorer 2

    I succumbed to the lure of Rolex about a year ago: an Explorer 2 from Sales Corner, on a NATO with no box or papers, and a reported service history. It’s replaced everything else.

    I’m not happy about this. I wanted to be distantly interested, but eventually disdainful. I even use a story about the value pricing which Rolex practices in the lectures on purchasing I give, and point out that for a tenth of the price of a Rolex, a well designed product, with a swiss movement, often built in Germany although designed in Sheffield, is available. The other 90% is, presumably, marketing and profit.

    But it’s there. Sat on my wrist, or peering at me from the corner of the desk if I’m in heavy typing mode. I’m using it as an everyday watch, on its more recent bracelet now. It’s travelled round the world with me, where the easy GMT hand setting comes in. The generally excellent timekeeping (except at high altitude and cold, suggesting a lube problem) stops me playing with it. It’s not large, or particularly flashy. More unassuming. It goes to formal dinners, and sailing and motorcycling and cycling. It times eggs and lectures.

    The lume holds up well, for a 90’s watch. I like looking at it.

    Objectively, it’s no better than the PRS82 it supplanted. I still love the 82, and it gets worn regularly. However, the Explorer 2 always comes back.

    I can’t really explain it. I think a lot is the case, which is small and finely balanced ( although less beautiful than my shortly to depart PRS68). It weights little. The case diameter is unassuming but it fits me well.

    Aside from the slight guilt of enjoying something which I thought was a needless extravagance, it’s an excellent watch and I can’t quite picture replacing it, or see it withdrawing to the back of the watch box. I did really want a GMT, but I can’t see it being twice as good as an Explorer 2, and the need has faded.

    I’m surprised at myself.



    (and there would be a photo, but photo bucket appears to have imploded again!)

    Last edited by Hubs; 25th April 2017 at 21:56.

  2. #2
    More of an ode than a homage:-)

  3. #3
    Grand Master Dave+63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    15,990
    It's got you!

    (Typed whilst wearing a GMT!)

  4. #4
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,500
    An excellent reflection on what I think is one of Rolex's best. I enjoyed your post

    Dave


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Great to read from someone who initially believed it to be an extravagant purchase.
    But now wears it more and more and uses it for what it was designed to do.
    A lovely tale.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post
    More of an ode than a homage:-)
    Indeed. I was concerned for a moment that the legendary Monte Spiga may have competition

  7. #7
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Suffolk, UK
    Posts
    480
    One day I hope to feel this way about a watch I own. Enjoy it. It's like having married the perfect woman for you.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokyo Tokei View Post
    Indeed. I was concerned for a moment that the legendary Monte Spiga may have competition
    No matching that review!

  9. #9
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    North East, England
    Posts
    1,498
    I've been trying to make my mind up between this and the newer larger version and I still can't!

  10. #10
    Grand Master Dave+63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    15,990
    Quote Originally Posted by relaxer7 View Post
    I've been trying to make my mind up between this and the newer larger version and I still can't!
    Personally, I'd go 40mm, the larger one's not quite right to my eye.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by relaxer7 View Post
    I've been trying to make my mind up between this and the newer larger version and I still can't!
    42. Smokes the 40mm version.

  12. #12
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,739
    I swapped my 42 for a 40. One of my better watch-related decisions. Lighter, better size, plenty legible and a touch more discreet.

  13. #13
    Craftsman RS404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Norwich, Norfolk
    Posts
    879
    I thought this was going to be a thread about a Steinhart.

  14. #14
    Grand Master RustyBin5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Scotland central
    Posts
    13,205
    Quote Originally Posted by RS404 View Post
    I thought this was going to be a thread about a Steinhart.
    Or this lol


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by RS404 View Post
    I thought this was going to be a thread about a Steinhart.
    That could be arranged ;-)

    (sitting here with my Ocean One Vintage GTM "Gunter" Ltd Edition, 42mm and gert lush)

  16. #16
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    177
    For me this model is the modern Rolex that still comes across as a finely machined tool (just like in it's heyday past) rather than today's overt jewelry bling.

  17. #17
    Grand Master RustyBin5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Scotland central
    Posts
    13,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallang View Post
    For me this model is the modern Rolex that still comes across as a finely machined tool (just like in it's heyday past) rather than today's overt jewelry bling.
    Rolex? Overt jewellery bling? Don't be ridiculous


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  18. #18
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by RustyBin5 View Post
    Rolex? Overt jewellery bling? Don't be ridiculous


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Also I made my comment in the full knowledge that wearing a thousands of pounds watch with ROLEX plastered on the dial might still possibly count as jewelry bling no matter how toolish the watch is. Just that finely machined tool watch bling seems cooler than shiny diamonds bling.

  19. #19
    Grand Master RustyBin5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Scotland central
    Posts
    13,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallang View Post
    Also I made my comment in the full knowledge that wearing a thousands of pounds watch with ROLEX plastered on the dial might still possibly count as jewelry bling no matter how toolish the watch is. Just that finely machined tool watch bling seems cooler than shiny diamonds bling.
    Of course. My post was in jest.....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #20
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Surrey and Westminster
    Posts
    269
    Quote Originally Posted by RustyBin5 View Post
    Rolex? Overt jewellery bling? Don't be ridiculous


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I have an overwhelming urge to put it in my mouth and suck it... all those different flavours!!!

  21. #21
    Grand Master Dave+63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    15,990
    Quote Originally Posted by MAW View Post
    I have an overwhelming urge to put it in my mouth and suck it!!!
    Pm sent

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information