Originally Posted by
draftsmann
To keep this as simple as possible... the IHT rules distinguish between different types of gift.
The kind of gift we have been discussing in this thread is a simple, outright gift between individuals - called a "potentially exempt transfer" because it is presumed exempt when made, so no tax is payable at the time of the gift, and provided the donor survives seven years the exemption is confirmed so no tax is payable at all. There is no lifetime limit for such gifts.
Gifts into most kinds of trust (sometimes called "settled gifts") are subject to different IHT rules. These rules have seen some tightening in recent years - there was a radical recategorising of trusts in the Finance Act 2006 which brought gifts onto certain commonly-used kinds of trust out of the potentially exempt transfer regime and into the "relevant property" regime for trusts. Under the relevant property rules a trust is treated as an estate in its own right, with its own nil rate band (ie the first £325k based on the current threshold is taxed at zero per cent, with the balance taxable at special rates that apply to trusts).
There used to be considerable scope for tax planning by taking advantage of what were fairly lax "related settlement" rules. Essentially, provided someone set up multiple trusts on separate days (even if they were consecutive days), each trust would benefit from its own nil rate band - so a gift of assets such as shares expected to grow significantly could be spread between several trusts so as to reduce the IHT exposure.
Several years ago the UK government proposed revising these rules so that an individual would have a "lifetime nil rate band" that would be divided between however many trusts he or she created- you may have happened upon some commentary on the consultation for this when you were Googling.
That consultation did not lead to the creation of a lifetime NRB for settled gifts, but the rules for multiple trusts were amended so as to limit the scope for the kind of planning I described above - a full analysis falls way beyond the scope of this post!
As an aside, when I began my career in trust and tax work 30-odd years ago (yes, I do this for a living...) the canon of IHT law was just about the slimmest volume compared to income tax, CGT, corporation tax, VAT, etc, so I decided to learn it inside out and become "expert" in it. IHT has traditionally been a bit of a political football, given that it is a tax on wealth, and previous Tory manifestos were proposing drastically increasing the threshold or even abolishing the tax altogether. In fact the threshold has been frozen for quite a few years now (following several decades during which it was indexed annually) and that slim volume is now much fatter due to a massive (in my opinion disproportionate) increase in aggressive anti-avoidance legislation. At least it's kept me busy.