The prices in the OP are wrong - the black dial hi-beat diver is $9600, the LE is $9800 and the LE Spring Drive chrono is $15800. See the US Grand Seiko site for reference.
The new diver looks good .yet another cool watch i cant afford
Sent from my Moto G (4) using TZ-UK mobile app
The prices in the OP are wrong - the black dial hi-beat diver is $9600, the LE is $9800 and the LE Spring Drive chrono is $15800. See the US Grand Seiko site for reference.
Hi Wayne
Where are those prices from? I tried your link but it didn't load, the US version of the Grand Seiko site is currently listing the prices as $9,600 for the regular production high beat diver and $9,800 for the limited edition with blue dial and extra silicone strap. Seems quite a bit cheaper though I suspect it's academic as the 46.9 mm case diameter and 17 mm thickness will probably put most people off.
https://grand-seiko.us.com/collections/
Edit:
Is this the source of the $14,200 & $14,600? - Australian dollars perhaps:
http://timeandtidewatches.com/hands-...e-want-it-bad/
Last edited by AKM; 24th March 2017 at 01:13.
Both these lives are genuinely mouth watering.
The blue diver is something else.
Am completely bowled over even if prices are eye watering.
The GS Divers are the first models from Basel 2017 I have any interest in until I read the size.
47mm? I know the world is getting fatter by the day but come on, how about a watch for a 5'11", 12.5 stone guy like me?
Square date placed where should be round index?
Looks horrid!
I'm really liking the simple 3 hander - absolutely stunning.
I've had plenty of people checking out my GS, looking intrigued that I have such a flashy looking or expensive watch, but then when they spot the Seiko logo they look away and relax. Usually someone wearing a Patek, Rolex or Omega. Other type of person is someone wearing a similarly styled Seiko 5 who looks back at theirs, disappointed and confused as to why theirs doesn't look like that. I'm not second guessing motives by the way, as have had conversations about it before!
Last edited by mindforge; 24th March 2017 at 09:40.
I have never had any 'normal' person notice my Grand Seiko watches. In a Rolex shop the staff pretend they think it is an Omega. They simply cannot cope with the idea of an expensive Japanese watch...especially one with 'Seiko' written on it.
Judging from the dollar price, the new 'classic' stainless steel 253 should retail around £5500, with discount, about £5000. I plan to drop my reservation for the 'Speedy Tuesday' and buy the 253. Can't afford both.
Last edited by paskinner; 24th March 2017 at 16:06.
The moment a full page Grand Seiko advert with RRP appears in a Sunday supplement then I'm busted.
I wish Seiko would employ someone to take actual pictures of their watches rather than the horrible pics they use on their promotional stuff.
You are probably correct.
If you simply look at the watches for sale, 'boutique watches' are already at the expensive end of the mass offerings.
The most sold are VERY low prices watches.
Amazon, although obviously not the begin an end all, is a nice indication.
Back to GrandSeiko and prices it is noteworthy that production is about half that of PP and the hands on effort is comparable with this paragon of luxury watches, not with the automated mass produced Swiss 'competition'.
This century Seiko sailed past Omega/Rolex with GS. It is just that on the whole Anglo Saxon wis are not yet willing to accept it.
P.s. At the very top end of their product range, Seiko are on par with Philippe Dufour and Laurent Ferrier. Albeit with more modern tech horology; at a higher plane of isochrony.
Last edited by Huertecilla; 24th March 2017 at 23:47.
Jura Watches have now listed the new GS models on their site for pre-order.
The limited edition hi beat diver is £10,000 and the regular production model is £9,500.
The ceramic spring drive chronographs are £14,000 and £15,000 for the limited edition.
The limited edition titanium dress watch with date (SBGR305) is £7,000.
Yes, quite expensive. The classic stainless steel recreation from the 60s, model 253, is £5500. For me, nicest watch to come from Basel this year . Although that is not saying much.......
Strong pricing and they'll be loads cheaper in Japan I expect. In fact easily enough of a difference to buy a cheap flight to Tokyo (£500) and a couple of nights in a cheap hotel (£200). Flagship store in Ginza and but it from it's home turf :-)
There are some dual branded 'Seiko Credor' watches knocking about. Are these considered to be 'classics'?
Wishful thinking...umm...I'd prefer not to think about it at all, just enjoy.
Re the 'more fun': For myself part of the appeal of Seiko and GS has always been the straightforwardness. Rolex comes with so much baggage. Not sure I want to know where the GS brand goes now.
Last edited by forpetesake; 25th March 2017 at 13:18.
Interesting observation that - they did feel like a day off flaunting luxury logos, it was almost a relief. But all brands bring their own baggage and preconceptions, including the Seiko logo itself. Hard to say how they will be perceived now, it depends on how much awareness they can build about the brand story and price point, how much they can differentiate from Seiko. Without that marketing push, people may assume it's 'just a Seiko' after all, that's trying hard to look like something 'better'.
I do think the GMT with the new branding looks good though, as does the Snowflake spring drive. They're not on their website oddly, and haven't been featured at the Baselworld launch as they are not new models exactly, but they are all over their adverts, and they do I think look better with the new branding - dare I say 'classier'?
Last edited by Itsguy; 25th March 2017 at 14:32.
I enjoy reading your posts Itsguy. They are well considered and persuasive, even though annoyingly I do generally end up agreeing with every word. My observation was shamelessly parochial and selfish, best kept secret and all that.
The new branding is an improvement and something we here have advocated in the past.
My GS purchases have lain at the limits of affordability, so there will be no more for me. I wish them every success.
Last edited by forpetesake; 25th March 2017 at 18:18.
Well ´is´, no and no, in neither case unanimously.
Good from a marketing pov and for many an image buyer or those who simply like a cleaner dial, not so for those who LIKE the ´Seiko´ branding and/or the ´only a Seiko´ aspect. See above in this very thread!
And a big NoNo for some as to pricing. Again good marketing into the Veblen sector but not only so nor unanimously.
Last edited by Huertecilla; 25th March 2017 at 19:59.
Once you get bitten by the GS bug, they become addictive. Nothing else has the same sparkle.
I happen to like the super high quality combined with "it's just a seiko". I don't always want to wear a Rolex, omega, IWC, etc - sometime a "just a seiko" is just right. Even so, that's probably not the niche that seiko wants their high end line to occupy.
Maybe I pick up one of "the citizen" models instead?
Indeed Huertecilla. But then you have misrepresented a single sentence and exploited it as a pitch for your lectern.
My remark relates to the 'classier' reference made at the end of Post 76 and refers to the dial placement and styling of 'SEIKO' 'GS' and 'Grand Seiko'. Many here have observed it to be either confused or inelegant and advocated its overhaul. Considered as a stylistic device I maintain that the new configuration is an improvement over the old.
If you had considered my posts with the same attention you expect your own to receive, you would not have made this mistake.
You would hope so since Dufour himself was responsible for training the GS employees on polishing techniques etc GS case, hand finishing are definitely on par with the top swiss. However movement architecture and design i would not go that far yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's not much forum love for them, but if you are thinking of quartz I can recommend the CTQ57-1202 (pics just for info purposes):
http://www.012.co.jp/citizen/the-cit...tq57-1202.html
This one doesn't have the Duratect or similar plating.
It is as well finished as any of my GS. The CTQ57-1203 is another beauty.
I am a big fan, and I understand the need to market GS more strongly. But the size and price of the new dive watches is a disappointment... I think I would prefer the big new Rolex, which is slightly cheaper. Not that I will be buying either!
The new 'classic' models are lovely, and I hope to have the basic stainless steel three-handed sometime this year. Just beautiful. My fourth Grand Seiko. Naughty. Assuming I can find the money.
Last edited by paskinner; 26th March 2017 at 10:20.
I saw a really nice comparison between the usual 37mm GS black dial quartz and a really similar looking quartz perpetual citizen in TI.
Seiko may be rebranding GS, but all the Japanese makers need to rethink their model designation. I'm into watches (really, probably too much) and I can't keep track of the million alpha numeric model names that they use.
On edit: it was the moderately weird looking Citizen AQ1010-54E
Last edited by JP Chestnut; 26th March 2017 at 14:16.
I am also a fan of GS, although some of the new watches are just too big for my taste.
Given the launch of the new GS range, it will be interesting to see what happens to the old ones in terms of it becoming collectible. Some retailers may discount the old range to make room for the new. Alternatively the old range may get dragged up along with the new price point - and some may prefer the old models and snap them up.
Sent from my SM-N910F using TZ-UK mobile app
Some beautiful photos of the new styled GS take on the vintage originals here,
https://api.watchville.co/v2/posts/27560/click
It has the lovely granulated dial that I admired on the platinum spring drive although obviously could never afford.
However on the wrist it just looks huge. I still like the idea of the snowflake but worry that it will also look too large on me. At 40mm, an all dial watch is too much for me, especially with thin lugs which accentuates the size.
A couple of thoughts on all of this. The 'moving up market' and associated rises in price - fair enough great finishing above their current price point. However why would you pay more for the same thing. They should have increased the warranty or service intervals at the same time, something additional. As for the range its mind numbing. I've wanted one for a while but digesting the line up is technically a ball ache. They need to sort this out. Something the Japanese don't do particularly well. The evolution of their core models is a total mystery. One thing I hope they do with the extra cash is have more places where you actually see these. That would go a long way to convincing a lot more people of the quality in the product.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
The more I look , the more the new pricing seems pretty ambitious. As a simple example, the limited edition 'classic' watch, 352, is £17000 in gold. That is for a straight three-handed. A JLC Master Control in gold, £12,000 (with date), a Rolex Cellini, gold, £11000. With longer guarantee and local stores to buy from. A 50% mark-up above Rolex?
Grand Seiko has no real base in the UK. Many of us buy by mail. Even a single Boutique opening in London cannot transform this. The pricing seems more than the market will tolerate, and I speak as a fan. I just hope they have this right......
There's thread on WUS about a c.6% price rise in the US, this will be applied to all models as they are rebranded. New models unveiled at Baselworld already have the 6% factored-in and won't rise:
http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=4168330
Worth knowing if anyone was planning on ordering an existing model from the US to do so before it gets the new logo. I don't know whether we can expect similar treatment in the UK, though there was a recent price increase here, unlike the situation in the US.
Last edited by AKM; 27th March 2017 at 16:07.