timefactors watches
Results 1 to 31 of 31

Thread: PRS-5

  1. #1
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228

    PRS-5

    Does anyone know if the PRS-5 will ever be made again?

    I had one and foolishly let it go a while back, epic fail on my part.

    I think because of the Worn & Wound article on asymmetrical chronographs and the CWC price rises there'd maybe be a market for them.

    Apologies if discussed before and i had a search but couldn't find a thread.


  2. #2
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    No there won't I'm afraid. Chronograph movements are too expensive.

  3. #3
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Through the Tannhauser gate
    Posts
    26,118
    I'm wearing my Broadarrow version as I type, my chrono mood veered from modern to a more vintage feel, so I swapped my DC56 for it. I've been considering a vast reduction of my watches lately, but both the PRS-5 and Everest would be staying.



  4. #4
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Ok thanks guys, that Damasko looks cool

  5. #5
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    It's a pity that there probably won't be any more PRS-5 or any other chronographs, but that's the way it goes I suppose.

  6. #6
    Craftsman ChronoCop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    E.U.-sur-mer
    Posts
    796
    Love my modified one.



    Cheers!
    Brane

  7. #7
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by ChronoCop View Post
    Love my modified one.

    Cheers!
    Brane
    Nice ! me too.

  8. #8
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    252
    This is a nice looking watch. I'm not sure why a chronograph would be too expensive to produce. Surely you just charge more?

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by ChronoCop View Post
    Love my modified one.



    Cheers!
    Brane
    Very nice! How is it modified?

  10. #10
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    Very nice! How is it modified?
    The handset has been changed, the stock ones are the syringe shape.

  11. #11
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by sammyl1000 View Post
    This is a nice looking watch. I'm not sure why a chronograph would be too expensive to produce. Surely you just charge more?

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    I agree, given that the CWC is now 1500, and rising...

  12. #12
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by sammyl1000 View Post
    This is a nice looking watch. I'm not sure why a chronograph would be too expensive to produce. Surely you just charge more?

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    I get the impression that the chronographs have never been the strongest sellers. Therefore, with the cost of chronograph movements rising in the way that they have and will probably continue to do so, increasing the price of watches with those movements is unlikely to result in more sales.

  13. #13
    Master sweets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol - UK
    Posts
    2,390
    Love the modded ones, those hands are perfect.
    Surely the PRS 5 was using a Chinese Seagul chrono, and these are still relatively affordable???
    D

  14. #14
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by sweets View Post
    Love the modded ones, those hands are perfect.
    Surely the PRS 5 was using a Chinese Seagul chrono, and these are still relatively affordable???
    D
    Using the seagull 1963 reissue as a yard stick for the cost of producing a watch housing the ST19 I'd imagine so. On bviously there would be a whole load of other risk, economic consideration and a deals to be done that I'm not privy to - so I'm guessing from some of the consensus it might not really be worth it.

    I'd have one though for about 500 new I reckon, probably more depending on the movement.

    There's one on eBay for 500 at the moment but he's just being a greedy bugger so not biting out of principle.

  15. #15
    Administrator swanbourne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sheffield, England
    Posts
    44,377
    There's a problem with the ST19, either the mainspring it too strong or the barrel click spring is too weak. There's no way of telling when, if ever, it will fail, it could be after months of use and suddenly the mainspring lets go and you can't develop a power reserve. When it was clear that this was a problem, we got new click springs made and replaced them during assembly of the watches and whilst this reduced the incidence of failure, it didn't eliminate it.

    There weren't a huge number which failed but when you have a dozen or so failing with the same problem, it's clear that something is not right. I'm not prepared to continue using this movement as long as the problem exists.

    Eddie
    Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".

  16. #16
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by swanbourne View Post
    There's a problem with the ST19, either the mainspring it too strong or the barrel click spring is too weak. There's no way of telling when, if ever, it will fail, it could be after months of use and suddenly the mainspring lets go and you can't develop a power reserve. When it was clear that this was a problem, we got new click springs made and replaced them during assembly of the watches and whilst this reduced the incidence of failure, it didn't eliminate it.

    There weren't a huge number which failed but when you have a dozen or so failing with the same problem, it's clear that something is not right. I'm not prepared to continue using this movement as long as the problem exists.

    Eddie
    Fair enough Eddie. Is there a quartz movement that would be suitable?

  17. #17
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    560
    That is interesting. My Sea gull 1963 failed just after Christmas (only had it since May and rarely worn). Winding it up as normal and after the third wind, I felt something catastrophic and the winder felt weird. Looked at the watch face and the hands were bent! The hands moved when trying to wind. I guess the mainspring went and somehow coupled the crown in wind position to time adjust.
    I didn't realise this was a known issue. I sent it back to Thomas in Hong Kong so hopefully it will be repaired/replaced. A shame if it's likely to happen again. I really like the look and feel of that movement. And the watch is great too.

  18. #18
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by swanbourne View Post
    There's a problem with the ST19, either the mainspring it too strong or the barrel click spring is too weak. There's no way of telling when, if ever, it will fail, it could be after months of use and suddenly the mainspring lets go and you can't develop a power reserve. When it was clear that this was a problem, we got new click springs made and replaced them during assembly of the watches and whilst this reduced the incidence of failure, it didn't eliminate it.

    There weren't a huge number which failed but when you have a dozen or so failing with the same problem, it's clear that something is not right. I'm not prepared to continue using this movement as long as the problem exists.

    Eddie
    Thank you Eddie, very interesting & much appreciated, comprehensively cleared that one up !

  19. #19
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    Fair enough Eddie. Is there a quartz movement that would be suitable?
    Quartz wouldn't be the same thing at all - pointless.

  20. #20
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by kk View Post
    Quartz wouldn't be the same thing at all - pointless.
    Not pointless at all. It's good enough for for CWC.

  21. #21
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    Not pointless at all. It's good enough for for CWC.
    I can only think of one quartz chronograph I could be bothered with and that's the JLC mecaquartz as used in various JLC and IWC models in the 1990s.

    The vast majority of quartz chronographs just fail the desirability test.

  22. #22
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by kk View Post
    I can only think of one quartz chronograph I could be bothered with and that's the JLC mecaquartz as used in various JLC and IWC models in the 1990s.

    The vast majority of quartz chronographs just fail the desirability test.
    ETA 251.262 with centre minutes totaliser as used in the Precista PRS-17C and its Thermoline version, i.e. 251.232.

  23. #23
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    ETA 251.262 with centre minutes totaliser as used in the Precista PRS-17C and its Thermoline version, i.e. 251.232.
    Layout 100% wrong for this style of watch.

  24. #24
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Through the Tannhauser gate
    Posts
    26,118
    Quote Originally Posted by kk View Post
    Quartz wouldn't be the same thing at all - pointless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    Not pointless at all. It's good enough for for CWC.

    Ever wondered why you very rarely, if ever, see a PRS5 for sale? More so the original Broadarrow version with the Poljot 3133 movement?

  25. #25
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by magirus View Post
    Ever wondered why you very rarely, if ever, see a PRS5 for sale? More so the original Broadarrow version with the Poljot 3133 movement?

    I know I'm gutted I sold mine but I also know I'd never in a million years buy a quartz version.

  26. #26
    Master Timelord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    ETA 251.262 with centre minutes totaliser as used in the Precista PRS-17C and its Thermoline version, i.e. 251.232.
    Quote Originally Posted by kk View Post
    Layout 100% wrong for this style of watch.
    I didn't say that it was the right layout for this type of watch, but then neither is the tricompax JLC mecaquartz that you admire so much. The point I was making is that you you are prepared to dismiss nearly all quartz chronograph movements, including that used in the PRS-17C.

  27. #27
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Timelord View Post
    I didn't say that it was the right layout for this type of watch, but then neither is the tricompax JLC mecaquartz that you admire so much. The point I was making is that you you are prepared to dismiss nearly all quartz chronograph movements, including that used in the PRS-17C.
    Would never in a million years consider buying a watch with this movement or, indeed, with this layout - just a bit cheesey.

  28. #28
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    114
    There are 2 PRS-5's on Ebay at the moment, one buy it now which has not shifted for around a month or more and one on open auction. Both UK sellers.

  29. #29
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Through the Tannhauser gate
    Posts
    26,118
    Quote Originally Posted by PeteS View Post
    There are 2 PRS-5's on Ebay at the moment, one buy it now which has not shifted for around a month or more and one on open auction. Both UK sellers.


    The BIN example tells us what these aren't worth, the example for auction should give an idea of what they are worth.

  30. #30
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    892
    Time for me to pull this old picture out of the bag again... I loved the view inside!


  31. #31
    Master Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Co. Durham
    Posts
    6,929
    Quote Originally Posted by magirus View Post
    Ever wondered why you very rarely, if ever, see a PRS5 for sale? More so the original Broadarrow version with the Poljot 3133 movement?
    There's two up in Co. Durham I know of! NOT for sale. Cracking good watch.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •