closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 38 of 38

Thread: New Explorer - day one

  1. #1

    New Explorer - day one

    So, I got my Explorer today, thanks to a thread on this forum flagging an AD who had one in stock (hat tip to both Bluemoon7 for the heads-up, and Eddie for the facility). Thought I'd jot down a couple of initial impressions.




    First, the "2016" changes to the Explorer - i.e. the revised handset and the new arabics.

    The hands didn't bother me on the pre-2016 version of the 214270 Explorer (I should say at this stage that I've seen the older model "in-the-metal" plenty). I am glad that the minute hand now reaches the track, but would've been happy regardless.

    The arabics, however, were the one thing holding me back from the pre-2016 version. Two reasons for this: I thought the solid filled arabics too blingy for my taste, and I didn't like the negative space in the lume at night. The revised applications sort these issues out for me perfectly.




    Other observations so far:

    I was a touch worried about the Chromalight, since the official pics make it look like it's Royal Blue on the new Explorer. I'm happy to report it's still a lovely bluey-green, or greeny-blue, and does not to my eyes move too unfavourably from a traditional lume (when asked, my daughter pronounced it green).

    This watch fits superbly, even on a small (6.75") wrist. I'm highly conservative, but even for me the 36mm Explorer is now just that fraction too small in stature for a modern tool watch. Don't get me wrong - if I was lucky enough to own a 36mm Explorer I would certainly not be thinking of changing it... I suppose I'm just saying that coming to it fresh, the 39mm is a really good size. This 39mm Explorer does not "wear big" or anything like that... it's a 39mm case, with a c.31mm face, and it wears just as those specs would suggest... in other words, like a plain, unobtrusive watch.

    It's not big, it's not small. It's just right.

    The explorer booklet that shipped with mine was clearly hung-over from the pre-2016 version, since it featured two separate sketch drawings of the watch's face, both of which showed the solid gold arabics instead of the lume-filled arabics. It's interesting that, even in the days of the ur-corporate Rolex behemoth, these little transition quirks continue to slip through.

    Hope this is useful to anyone considering a purchase, let me know if you have any thoughts or questions :)









  2. #2
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    158
    Looking good, I fancy one myself. Thanks for the initial impressions.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there
    Posts
    7,948
    Blog Entries
    1
    Lovely!

  4. #4
    Thanks for taking the time for a review.

    That looks really cool, I have been waiting to see one in a window of a AD near me, no luck so far, so I popped in and asked on Saturday and they had sold their first one that morning. I have never owned a Rolex but the explorer might change this. They did show me their new Airking, nice but not me.

    They have said they will call me when the next one appears, I had just bought a diamond eternity ring a couple of weeks earlier from them for my wife, they made her feel really special and it was a real spur of the moment thing, as she spotted what she wanted one day.

  5. #5
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Somerset (U.k )
    Posts
    12,254
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks for your thoughts on the Explorer.

    Im on the cusp of this or the Airking.

    Clinton, who has the new Airking down your way?

  6. #6
    Master sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    UK/Canada
    Posts
    4,677
    Thanks for the write-up and photos. I plan to at least put my name down for one of these later this week, that's if the AD doesn't have one to sell. I've had and enjoyed my Everest for a few years now, so moving on the Explorer seems the right thing to do.

    Although I think I could certainly be happy with the old Explorer version's hands, the longer ones are an improvement in my opinion. I also shared the 'too blingy' idea of the solid numerals of the old version; however, I suspect that living with them for a long time, they'd not be an issue either as they seem to blend in with the dial and disappear under certain light conditions.

    Anyway, the subtle changes to the new model, along with liquidation of much of my existing collection earlier this year, mean I'm looking forward to this one a lot.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there
    Posts
    7,948
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ben4watches View Post
    Thanks for your thoughts on the Explorer.

    Im on the cusp of this or the Airking.

    Clinton, who has the new Airking down your way?
    There is one in Goldsmiths CC.

  8. #8
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    End of the world
    Posts
    3,460
    Blog Entries
    9
    I have the previous version. Not sure why but this one looks a lot more different to me (in a good way)

  9. #9
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    358
    Thanks for the write up, I too am waiting to see one in the flesh as this could be my first Rolex too.

  10. #10
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sunny Kirkcaldy
    Posts
    4,529
    Thanks for the write up, seriously considering one of these myself

  11. #11
    Master Crispin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,059
    Really nice review enjoyed reading that, thanks for taking the time. Have only owned subs and an air king in the past, but this was the watch in the National Geographic ads that first kindled an interest....

  12. #12
    Excellent well written review. Thanks for sharing.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Town and country
    Posts
    3,520
    Congratulations, enjoy your lovely watch, and thanks for the pics.

  14. #14
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    2,829
    Blog Entries
    1
    Lovely watch and thank you for pointing out the developments from the older model.

    ATB

    Jon

  15. #15
    Craftsman Pistolpete21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    355
    The new explorer looks super. I'm very envious. Thanks for the initial review, enjoy!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. #16
    Master paneristi372's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Barrowford
    Posts
    3,109
    Beautiful, its definitely more in proportion now with the longer hands, more akin to the proportions of the older 36mm Explorer. Great move by Rolex IMO

  17. #17
    Congrats, nice watch. I have the previous version and I still prefer it over these changes. On the revised one, the hands are now too large (the hour hand looks out of proportion as it is now too fat and the lume on the minute hand now overlaps the lume on the hour markers when it previously lined up perfectly) This second point in particular is definitely a mistake on the part of Rolex. It would really frustrate me and due to my OCD, I could never own such a watch.

    I think that Rolex just didn't need to make the minute hand extend to the same length as the second hand. I very much like having a second hand that is longer than a minute hand and a minute hand that is longer than an hour hand. In my mind, that's the way it should be. Also, in my opinion, the lume filled 3,6,9 appears to cheapen the watch when compared with the understated elegance of the white gold on the previous version (it now looks like a fake I once saw in Turkey) Still, I will hold onto my original 214270 with pride and I'm sure that its limited run as the first 39mm version will make it very desirable in the future.
    Last edited by jacktheripper; 31st August 2016 at 15:16.

  18. #18
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    314
    Looks great and thanks for the review!

  19. #19
    Journeyman Seal-Dweller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Sherfield-on-Loddon
    Posts
    178

    New Explorer - day one

    Really enjoyed reading the review and loved the pictures. I picked mine up from WoS in Regents St yesterday. Agree that it really is a beautiful and well-proportioned watch!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Seal-Dweller; 1st September 2016 at 07:03.

  20. #20
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    SW London
    Posts
    144
    Very nice photos, thanks. You have made it look better than the very 'blingy' look in a jewellers window.

  21. #21
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    952
    Really enjoyed reading this. Thank you for the lovely photos. Enjoy the watch.

    Is the bracelet brushed? I love the fact that this watch looks less blingy than others I've seen (as mentioned in a previous post).
    Do you know how thick the watch is... weirdly I can't find the dimensions anywhere!

    Great stuff! Love it. A classic for sure.

  22. #22
    Master colin t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,637
    Wrist shot please

  23. #23
    Took them a while but they got there in the end at their usual "glacial" pace. Perfect.

    You know - it wouldn't surprise me if, a few years down the line, rolex decided to fix the air-king too.

  24. #24
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    London and SW
    Posts
    257
    I was fortunate to buy one today. If paying full price for a luxury chunk of metal is 'lucky'. Mappin & Webb on Regents Street. As the bracelet was being adjusted another chap was asking to buy one. Sales assistant stated that the group had stock and could get one quickly if that helps anyone.

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    On The Fringe
    Posts
    17,010
    Tried this on today and IMHO this will be one of the strongest selling models.

    Great price under £4.5k, much better proportions for the modern world, but still very classical looking.

    The hand change I can live with or without, but the 3,6,9 is just so much better in real life.

    Great watch.

  26. #26
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    London and SW
    Posts
    257
    I was pretty convinced I wanted a 36mm explorer. I have a 6 3/4" wrist and didn't get on with my ceramic sub. However, this model feels different and in my opinion does not look huge on my wrist. Updated clasp allowing hot weather adjustment (unlike the 36mm versions but something I liked about the sub) and 5-year warranty combined with great proportions and decent lume sold it.

  27. #27
    Master yonsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Sweden & yonsson.com
    Posts
    2,757
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rolex finally got it right, congrats!

  28. #28
    Master Thorien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Herts
    Posts
    3,255
    Nice write up and a great watch, congratulations! It's one I have in my list too, can't wait.

  29. #29
    Master colin t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,637
    Any photos on a 6.75" wrist gratefully received!

  30. #30
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    952
    Quote Originally Posted by colin t View Post
    Any photos on a 6.75" wrist gratefully received!
    Ditto. This could derail my hulk plans as I am conservative by nature

    Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

  31. #31
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    5,732
    A great review. It’s a superb watch. I cannot identify anything that I can find fault with. While that may sound like faint praise, to my jaded eyes (as I look around for a new watch for myself) it is a rare occurrence.

  32. #32
    Master Tazmo61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,948
    A great review of a lovely Rolex , thank you .

  33. #33
    Okay, many thanks for all the comments and interest. Here are some wrist shots (due to popular demand) on my 6.75" wrist. I've taken a couple directly and a couple in a mirror, to show differing perspectives. All are taken with a 50mm (35mm eq.) lens, so relatively non-distorted....

    Direct shots on the wrist (so, from about 600mm, not cropped):








    And some shots in a mirror (so, from about 2000mm, cropped):






  34. #34
    What's that, you're fed up seeing this explorer mooching around Tarkovsky polaroids and want to see it being all butch and stuff in a few egregious photographic cliches? Maybe with something outdoorsey like a tree stump? Okay, I think we have time for that...


















  35. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by jeepie View Post
    Is the bracelet brushed?
    Yep

    Quote Originally Posted by jeepie View Post
    I love the fact that this watch looks less blingy than others I've seen (as mentioned in a previous post).
    Me too. It has a great mix to be honest, it'll still catch the light on the wrist but is more muted than it looks in a display, where I think the lighting tends to do this type of watch a disservice.

    Quote Originally Posted by jeepie View Post
    Do you know how thick the watch is... weirdly I can't find the dimensions anywhere!
    12mm (for comparison's sake, AirKing is 14mm).

  36. #36
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    London and SW
    Posts
    257
    Far better pictures than I could produce..! I have an iPhone wrist shot but don't have any host site so can't seem to upload.

  37. #37
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    5,732
    Very useful wrist photos.

    Is the dial glossy?

  38. #38
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    952
    Quote Originally Posted by JGJG View Post
    Yep



    Me too. It has a great mix to be honest, it'll still catch the light on the wrist but is more muted than it looks in a display, where I think the lighting tends to do this type of watch a disservice.



    12mm (for comparison's sake, AirKing is 14mm).
    Crikey. This is looking pretty much PERFECT. Thanks so much for the reply JGJG. Keep us updated with your experiences. I'm very very tempted to divert my attention to this beauty!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information