closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 78 of 78

Thread: Best Rolex to get

  1. #51
    ^
    Yes, rather gimmicky. :|

    Explorer's a good shout, though.

  2. #52
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    843
    I really like the Explorer 1. Really is a great watch.

  3. #53
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    pride of the north
    Posts
    961

    If can source excellent choice bigfish

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by LRB255 View Post
    If can source Explorer excellent choice bigfish

  4. #54
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by LRB255 View Post
    If can source excellent choice bigfish

    - - - Updated - - -
    Don't think there is an issue getting a new Explorer is there ?

  5. #55
    Whoever suggested the green glass black dial milgauss its a good shout. One of the few Rolex I'd wager will be wanted in the future.

  6. #56
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,498
    None of them!

    If future-proofing is a key consideration maybe you shouldn`t be spending a few £K on a watch.

    Buy what you like if you can afford it. Alternatively, buy secondhand, but don`t rely on future values and don`t let that sway your thinking.

    Trying to predict future values of watches is fraught with uncertainty; I think we'll see big changes over the next 10-15 years in the way conventional watches are perceived.

    Paul

  7. #57
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Between here, there and nowhere
    Posts
    3,442
    ^^^^^^
    I tend to agree, as traditional mechanical watch development is basically static, more evolution than revolution and as technology moves forward, I think they'll be left behind or go even higher up the luxury ladder.

    Very fine watches now are just a luxury item, great to be enjoyed but realistically unnecessary. Having said that it doesn't stop me constantly looking for the next one to add to the collection

  8. #58
    Grand Master Chris_in_the_UK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norf Yorks
    Posts
    42,918
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    None of them!

    If future-proofing is a key consideration maybe you shouldn`t be spending a few £K on a watch.

    Buy what you like if you can afford it. Alternatively, buy secondhand, but don`t rely on future values and don`t let that sway your thinking.

    Trying to predict future values of watches is fraught with uncertainty; I think we'll see big changes over the next 10-15 years in the way conventional watches are perceived.

    Paul
    Not hugely Paul TBH.

    Whilst I know your likes, there are a few ways of mitigating things.

    Buying a SS Sports model at retail (or slightly less) is pretty sure fire.

    Bad things do are (no specific order) TT of any flavour, new models over list, new (supposed limited runs) unless you are n for the long haul, non sports, precious metal models.

    Easy really.
    When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........

  9. #59
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    sometimes Suomi.........
    Posts
    2,310
    Blog Entries
    2

    116600SDc

    Seadweller 4000

  10. #60
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,498
    Agreed, some models are likely to lose money faster than others, but my point is that predicting future trends isn`t straightforward. I think we're entering uncharted waters regarding watch values and that's why I wouldn`t rely on any models holding their value as they have in the past.

    If maintaining high residual value is that much of a priority I question the whole logic of buying a Rolex. In the same way that we accept the losses on depreciation with cars my 'base case' assumption would be to write off at least 50% of the cost of a new watch. If you can`t spare the money, and accept the loss of a substantial amount of the purchase price, maybe it's not the right decision. The alternative is to buy the watch you like, keep it long term, and don`t fret about the value or potential resale. A far healthier approach IMO.

    Paul

  11. #61
    Craftsman halfpasttwothirty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    The Deep North
    Posts
    763
    Submariner.

  12. #62
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8
    Hulk or green milgaus ... :)

  13. #63
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nice, France
    Posts
    29
    Sub 5513 and Explorer 2 16570

  14. #64
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    North East, England
    Posts
    1,498
    I think Rolex are in a bit of a transition period at the moment.. After this years BaselWorld and their multiple model upgrades and re-sizing it will be interesting to see what happens to the second hand market over the next 5 years. Will the value of the now smaller and possibley slightly less desirable watches go down or will inflation/price increases keep it all in line? Who knows! What if gold makes a come back?

    That said, IMO if the OP picks up a used SS Sports model at a good price he won't go far wrong :)

  15. #65

    Question

    So is the answer to the O/P a) an Omega, not Rolex? and b) a lovely CK2998?

    Answers on a postcard please......

  16. #66
    benwoodroffe
    Guest
    I think the best Rolex to get is the one you want the most, that suits your budget

    If you're looking to do the cash in the wrist thing - if buying new, get the one with the longest waiting list, if used, the one that's the hardest to find.

    For me that's the Oyster Perpetual 39mm in grey, and I think Rolex know who the likes of I am and they know that I would have bought a vintage datejust by now - had they not come up with that something new for me to buy from them, instead of me buying a watch they made ages ago from someone else.

  17. #67
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by Gareth-W View Post
    So is the answer to the O/P a) an Omega, not Rolex? and b) a lovely CK2998?

    Answers on a postcard please......

    Well, looks like I have the new model Explorer to go and see if I like. Postcard sent 👍

  18. #68
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    pride of the north
    Posts
    961
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfish View Post
    Well, looks like I have the new model Explorer to go and see if I like. Postcard sent 
    Ive always liked the look of the old explorer, not having seen the new model in the flesh though it certainly looks even more appealing in photos. Good luck and would be a mighty fine addition to your existing collection :)

  19. #69
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    sometimes Suomi.........
    Posts
    2,310
    Blog Entries
    2
    The one you can afford and if you can afford one, a Seadweller 4000c

    M

  20. #70
    What he said

    Quote Originally Posted by magirus View Post
    Quite simply the one you like the look of most, you will look at it many thousands of times. Anyone who worries about future values, and uses the term "investment" in regard to watches is in the wrong hobby.

  21. #71
    Seadweller

  22. #72
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Binghamton USA
    Posts
    18

    Best Rolex to get

    My vote is for BLNR, SD4000

  23. #73
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Binghamton USA
    Posts
    18

    Green Milgauss/black dial

    Or SD 4000/NLNR

  24. #74
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    5,128
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyp View Post
    Whoever suggested the green glass black dial milgauss its a good shout. One of the few Rolex I'd wager will be wanted in the future.
    Yes, a great watch , and likely to be far more appreciated in the long term. However, the only reason to buy any luxury item is because you enjoy it.

  25. #75
    It seems that any Rolex that is on verge of being discontinued or has been, is the one to have.

    Any of the 'sports' modules will always be a fairly safe bet I think based on history.

  26. #76
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,462
    Always a Submariner Date

    D


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  27. #77
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    408
    I'd say a Hulk. But all subs will do.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  28. #78
    Grand Master Andyg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    24,924
    Quote Originally Posted by blackal View Post

    I bought my first new Rolex in 1981 (GMT-Master) for £208 duty-free (around £500 in UK shops?). Not sure its value now, but has to be around £3k?

    "Cheapest watch I have ever owned"

    Correct - if a 16750, one owner with box and papers, you are looking north of £5.5K if its in reasonable condition.

    Cheap as chips. I also got mine in 81, but bought 2nd hand in the UK and it cost me £325.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by helidoc View Post
    Always a Submariner Date

    D


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Agreed.

    Whoever does not know how to hit the nail on the head should be asked not to hit it at all.
    Friedrich Nietzsche


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information