Hi
Not sure if it's just me but I can't see a picture
Hi all my dad is looking to bid on a watch at auction but i wanted to see what you guys think of it ad i have no clue about this watch.
Here is the description given by the auctioner.
A 9ct Gold Wristwatch, signed Rolex, model: Precision, 1960, (calibre 1200) lever movement signed and numbered 95377, silvered dial with Arabic and dagger markers, subsidiary seconds, snap-on back with a presentation inscription, case back stamped inside with maker's mark ALD and numbered 12868 37786, Birmingham hallmark, 32mm wide, with Rolex boxes, original guarantee and booklet 03.03.16, Case with minor scratches, back cover with a presentation inscription, later strap and buckle, dial is clean, movement is clean and in going order.
Does it look ok or the dial redone ?
Cheers
Richard
Last edited by youngr; 29th March 2016 at 21:02.
Hi
Not sure if it's just me but I can't see a picture
try refreshing the page as its fine for me
Rich
The picture will only be visible if one is logged into rolexforums.com. You'll need to host it elsewhere for most people here to see it.
Just changed the location
I'd say the dial is redone.
Foggy
I would take a real look at the size. If he's aware fine but its easy to overlook that its a 32mm watch. Putting things in perspective, people currently debate whether 36mm is too small for a watch, with many manufacturers discontinuing this size.
32mm is going to wear really small; I don`t mind smaller watches but anything below 33 is getting a bit too small. That's how things were back I the 50s, though.
Judging by how clean the dial looks, I`d say it's been refinished. However, on this type of watch I don`t see that as an issue provided it's been done well.
For me, the size would be too small. I own several 34mm watches which look fine, but this is a bit too small IMO.
Paul
This looks similar: http://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/au...1-a44700d2f5c3 - estimated at ~£400-00 back in 2013... no idea what it actually sold for of course!
Lovely looking watch but really on the small size