closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser

View Poll Results: which omega ? ( one only )

Voters
164. You may not vote on this poll
  • aqua Terra

    51 31.10%
  • speedmaster

    73 44.51%
  • seamaster pro

    40 24.39%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 66

Thread: aqua Terra , speedmaster or seamaster pro

  1. #1
    Grand Master seikopath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    29,758

    aqua Terra , speedmaster or seamaster pro

    If you could only have ONE of the above watches ( any variant of each ) which would it be ?
    Good luck everybody. Have a good one.

  2. #2
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    185
    Speedmaster for me !

  3. #3
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,510
    Tough choice, head says AT, heart says Speedy Pro! (obviously went with my head when I had the choice, still tempted by a Speedy though...)

  4. #4
    Would a Railmaster 39mm count as an Aqua Terra? if so that would be my choice.


  5. #5
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,301
    I love my speedy pro but the AT gets so much more wrist time, doubt I will ever get rid of either but I had to choose the AT would stay.

  6. #6
    Grand Master MartynJC (UK)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    12,336
    Blog Entries
    22
    I've had all three. The seamaster got way the most time. So gets my vote. Lots of variations - maybe the new Americas cup version is more current.

  7. #7
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    52
    Aqua terra for me would get the most wrist time. Such a versatile look

  8. #8
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Chilterns
    Posts
    472
    I'm torn because I have the AT and Seamaster Pro, both in blue.
    In fact wearing the Pro now, but the AT to me is sheer class.
    If only one it will be the AT...........

  9. #9
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,729
    It's a tough choice.



    The AT is the most versatile.
    The Speedy is an iconic design.
    The POLM is my favourite watch because I associate it with my Dad.

    Removing the sentimental attachment, I'd probably keep the Speedy.

  10. #10
    Grand Master Velorum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    .
    Posts
    14,132
    Speedmaster for me

  11. #11
    Really wouldn't want to have to choose between my Seamaster and speedies but if no choice maybe just the Seamaster ..... or maybe just a Speedy ...... or.........

  12. #12
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Chilterns
    Posts
    472
    Quote Originally Posted by TBKBABAB View Post
    Really wouldn't want to have to choose between my Seamaster and speedies but if no choice maybe just the Seamaster ..... or maybe just a Speedy ...... or.........
    Yep, I know what you mean its a tough choice .....

  13. #13
    Master Rocket Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,695
    The Speedmaster is an iconic design that has stood the test of time.

    The other two are nice watches but nothing can touch the Speedy.

  14. #14
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    EAST MIDLANDS
    Posts
    623
    My wife has an aqua terra,i have had 4 different Seamaster SMP models. I still have 3 SMP's and my favourite is the 2230.50 non-americas cup. For me the Seamaster 2230.50 is my one choice.

  15. #15
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Devon, UK
    Posts
    422
    Already own a Planet Ocean, so as I'm voting for my second Omega, its gonna have to be the Speedmaster.

    Between the two of them, they are the iconic Omega watches........ IMHO.

  16. #16
    Master Saxon007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,261
    I love the Speedmaster, I have 3 and plan to get 2 more.

    I've owned and flipped a couple of Seamasters, I couldn't get along with the useless HE valve and setting the date every time I wore one was a pain. I do have an SM300 built from parts that I like but it doesn't get worn as often as the Speedmasters. Since the discontinuance of the Railmaster the AT line has nothing that interests me.

  17. #17
    Craftsman JayGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Salisbury
    Posts
    489
    Speedie by a nose; all are great watches

  18. #18
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3
    I'd have to go with the Aqua Terra GMT, not as iconic as the Speedmaster Pro, but a very nice watch.

  19. #19
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    miles away
    Posts
    2,049
    Speedy for me


    Although.......................

  20. #20
    Grand Master seikopath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    29,758
    I'm tending towards the AT. I know the speedie is an icon etc but I generally don't use chrono functions. The AT is just so clean.
    Good luck everybody. Have a good one.

  21. #21
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    1,383
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by dowsing View Post
    Would a Railmaster 39mm count as an Aqua Terra? if so that would be my choice.

    The Railmaster is an aqua terra.

    Man I regret selling mine every time I see one.

  22. #22
    Grand Master AlphaOmega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Trinovantum
    Posts
    11,313
    Difficult.

    I've had a few Speedies and sold them all.

    I've never thought about selling my 2264 though.

    You'll be tempted by the Speedie as it's a more iconic prospect but if you lead an active life, the SMP is probably the better choice.

    I've always thought of the Aqua Terra as being the Boxster to the Speedie's and SMP's 911.

    In my opinion.
    Last edited by AlphaOmega; 25th July 2015 at 19:25. Reason: Putting the boot into the AT

  23. #23
    Master DB9yeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8,264
    Have owned multiple variants of all three; without wanting to start a brand war here, both the AT and SM are bettered by the Rolex DJ/Exp and the Sub/SD range in my opinion.

    The Speedmaster stands apart - an absolute icon. Soyuz Meteorite dial, blue Gemini edition, anniversary Panda, people slag them for making too many special editions but we're spoilt for choice!

  24. #24
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,510
    Quote Originally Posted by DB9yeti View Post
    Have owned multiple variants of all three; without wanting to start a brand war here, both the AT and SM are bettered by the Rolex DJ/Exp and the Sub/SD range in my opinion.
    The AT/ Explorer or DJ comparison is interesting, but I would hope that a Sub would be better in terms of quality and finish than a SM ceramic as it's 2K more! Both are still iconic designs IMO.

  25. #25
    Journeyman SG73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    140
    AT for me. I tried on a speedy about 4 times. I decided that chronos are just not for me as I prefer a more simple dial without sub dials.

    I have the blue 'Skyfall' and love it.


  26. #26
    Journeyman SG73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    140

    aqua Terra , speedmaster or seamaster pro

    (Deleted Tapatalk generated duplicate post)
    Last edited by SG73; 26th July 2015 at 20:09.

  27. #27
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    1,327
    Speedmaster Pro which is why I bought one. An iconic watch and a large part of the appeal for me is that its a timeless classic.

  28. #28
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    398
    Come on, there is no contest here. It has to be the speedmaster.

  29. #29
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mostly Germany
    Posts
    17,392
    The Seamaster is good and strong but the He valve would annoy me I think. So, Aqua Terras (thanks, autocorrect), but an older one without the Monagesque yachty dial. Speedmaster out - too old, too fragile, unless one of the autos.
    Last edited by andrew; 26th July 2015 at 12:16.

  30. #30
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    175
    The Speedmaster for me, Reduced. I love everything about this watch, including its push buttons which I practically never use.

  31. #31
    I'm probably biased but Speedie Pro for me.
    Iconic design and interesting history. Looks great on bracelet, leather or canvas, so can be worn in almost any situation.

  32. #32
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Tonbridge, UK
    Posts
    329
    I have to agree with all the Speedmaster comments, however I voted for the Seamaster on the basis of practicality

    I have a 2254, 2220, and Speedmaster Pro. I always seem to have to think about what I am doing wearing the Speedy, the other two I never worry about, they take whatever I throw at them..

    That said I would never part with the Speedy as it was a 50th birthday present from my wife..

    Mark

  33. #33
    Craftsman tanatron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Lecco, Italy
    Posts
    530
    Speedy by a mile even though I hate watches without a date.

  34. #34
    My logic is perhaps flawed, but I reckon that if the speedie can make it to the moon and back it should be OK for daily wear. Apart from swimming that is.

  35. #35
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Salisbury
    Posts
    431
    Speedmaster for me, but I would not say no to them all.

  36. #36
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,383
    Quote Originally Posted by AlphaOmega View Post
    Difficult.

    I've had a few Speedies and sold them all.

    I've never thought about selling my 2264 though.

    You'll be tempted by the Speedie as it's a more iconic prospect but if you lead an active life, the SMP is probably the better choice.

    I've always thought of the Aqua Terra as being the Boxster to the Speedie's and SMP's 911.

    In my opinion.
    I have both a Speedmaster - the 3570.50 acrylic version, and the Seamaster Pro Quartz 2264.

    The Speedy is a beauty, and I love wearing it. It's as much a classic as a Double Red Seaweller, but much more accessible / affordable, and very versatile. But I've never worn it for swimming, though I'd wear it in the shower; and as a chronograph with a 30-minute sub register it's pretty legible. But, it's still a long way short in terms of both legibility and usability, or my Lemania 5100 powered Fortis B-42 LE Cosmonaut Chrono, with its centre minute chrono register. It's a classic piece of 1960's engineering, and beautiful with it - a bot like an E-Type Jaguar

    OTOH, the SMPQ is one of the most usable watches around; a real "no worries watch". It has great WR, and a smart yet sporty style, so I can wear it anywhere. The dial and hands are very well lumed and the sword hands reflect light very well in low light conditions, so it's as legible as any watch can be. And, it's quartz, which means that (a) it's robust and can cope with being dropped without ill-effect; (b) it has the really useful feature of a quick-set hour hand, allowing one to jump the time backwards or forwards an hour - perfect for travel; and (c) when it needs a service, it shouldn't cost an arm and a leg. It wears well on a NATO, rubber or the bracelet. Great watch; the nearest car equivalent would probably be a Golf GTi or Audi S3 - which will get you where you need to go, with no worries, and rather more reliably than the old E-type.

  37. #37
    Master SeanST150's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    2,777
    Of the 3 I own an AT. That's where my vote is going. It's just a simple, elegant and versatile watch. What's not to like?


  38. #38
    Having never owned any of these my vote would be the AT, with watches i think less is more and the AT has a certain class about it

  39. #39
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by 893bet View Post
    The Railmaster is an aqua terra.

    Man I regret selling mine every time I see one.

    I would agree, that's a very nice looking watch

  40. #40
    Master itsgotournameonit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Online/Offline
    Posts
    7,322
    I have been flipping through all three models for years now and cant give an honest answer as in their own right they are all lovely watches.

    Today this.


    Next week.Who the hell knows.

  41. #41
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    488
    I would say the AT. Looks good with everything. The clean look gives it longevity on the wrist IMO.

  42. #42
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    280
    I have a SMP, and a Speedmaster Reduced, so I voted for Aqua Terra.

    If I could find a blue Skyfall 41.5mm, then that would be perfect, but they're like rocking horse poop s-h so I may have to get the newer version which I think is inferior to look at.

    Something about Speedmaster Pros that appeal, but I know there are far too many variants and can even pin down which version I like most. This week it is the FOIS version.

  43. #43
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Stomach View Post
    I have a SMP, and a Speedmaster Reduced, so I voted for Aqua Terra.

    If I could find a blue Skyfall 41.5mm, then that would be perfect, but they're like rocking horse poop s-h so I may have to get the newer version which I think is inferior to look at.

    Something about Speedmaster Pros that appeal, but I know there are far too many variants and can even pin down which version I like most. This week it is the FOIS version.
    Also think the FOIS is the best current Speedy, but have to disagree on the AT - bought the current one and couldn't be happier! In fact, the more I see them, the more I dislike the date on the older one (I know I'm pretty much on my own here...)


  44. #44
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    280
    IanBear - gah, it does look fantastic.

  45. #45
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    530
    A speedterraseamaster

  46. #46
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield
    Posts
    1,801
    Speedmaster for me every time. Probably my favourite ever watch.

  47. #47

    seamaster

  48. #48
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Ashbourne, UK
    Posts
    391
    Don't own any of them but would love a Speedy.

  49. #49
    Speedy pro for me.
    I'm still on the search for a decent one (with the date/co-axial)

  50. #50
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    battle
    Posts
    17

    This one for me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information