Reply With QuoteNo! That is an absolute all-time classic.Originally Posted by xenon
I'll start:
I'll start: (It's pointless in practice, the design is classic)
Last edited by xenon; 29th December 2013 at 23:45.
No! That is an absolute all-time classic.I'll start:
Insert any Patek model here...
[sarcasm] Finally! A watch that I have to stare at for 30 seconds to get any scale of a rough time! I'm in love! [/sarcasm]
Well someone will post this sooner or later
Andy
Wanted - Damasko DC57
Yes
Nah. The Nautilus is a classic piece.
Wow....lovely :)Well someone will post this sooner or later
The twelve 5-9 Q and for the haters of G Shock one that the lovers will hate
Last edited by itsgotournameonit; 29th December 2013 at 23:01.
Al in the eye of the beholder...I do not behold :-)
Really ? Have to admit that that is my grail at the moment. Much prefer that to a Sub Hulk any day of the week. Weird this watch lark
Bad quality control, this one was sent out with a dial.
Calatrava?
I'm sure almost all the big Swiss boys would have turned out crimes against horology during the dark days of the 70s!
"I looked with pity not untinged with scorn upon these trivial-minded passers-by"
That Omega is a fantastic bit of kit.
And I agree about Patrick Philips, haven't seen a decent one.
"A man of little significance"
Best comment so far. Love it
Argos special
Some features (face colours and indices ) are ok, but I just can't get my mind around the size of the stopwatch features on Graham watches.
Beautiful.Bad quality control, this one was sent out with a dial.
There's no doubt they do produce ugly watches.
The Nautilus is OK, - but how many people would want one if it didn't have PP on it?
I don't understand this photo being on this thread. What is ugly or pointless about it?
Agreed !
It's not a bad looking watch. If it was about a grand, I'd think about one.
Of course, having PP on it adds a nought to the price, so in that respect I'd only want one if it didn't have PP on it!
No mention of the Clownmaster yet?
M
Breitling Cosmonaute 809 - What's not to like?
hehe...... pull the pin and roll it in there!!!!
Last edited by Desert_Weasel; 30th December 2013 at 13:46. Reason: spelling
Last edited by senraw; 30th December 2013 at 14:43.
I lóve the pun.
(which I assume is intended)
I find this a classic in highlighting the puzzle.
Anything with a Cyclops in the 21st century...(waiting to be shot down)
what's the point of GMT hand without 24h scale on bezel?
Finally someone gets it. Now that is, indeed, pointless!
Errrr... Serious?what's the point of GMT hand without 24h scale on bezel?
M.
Breitling Cosmonaute 809 - What's not to like?
But the cyclops magnifies the date. How can that be pointless?Anything with a Cyclops in the 21st century...(waiting to be shot down
Classic it might be in your opinion, doesn't stop it being hideous to look at IMO
I agree, especially now I am of a certain age I find a small date window difficult to read, - and as I never know the damn date.....
Instead of a cyclops, perhaps a bigger date window is the answer?
I am on the fence about this one
What the hell is that?
Nor does it in mine.
Mind; ´classic in highlighting the puzzle´
Perhaps. But the cyclops is a Rolex tradition and I'd be surprised if they dumped it anytime soon!
A véry interesting, different design of mechanical drive of a ´jump hour´ digital display.
I can easthetically totally appreciate it, though as a product only if it were at Fossil prices.
For someone who gets it, the GMT hand is pointless.
My goodness! This is beyond ugly!Really?
Zenith have had a few fugly buggers in their stable over recent years. I'll have to Google some images and add them...
*ahem*
Full story here http://www.watch-insider.com/reporta...here-in-basel/
Puzzle? Don't get it
Ruins so many great looking watches. Bloody hate them.Anything with a Cyclops in the 21st century...(waiting to be shot down
Technologically advanced it might be, but it's one ugly son of a ....I am on the fence about this one
But here we're talking ugly.
In this case, seriously ugly.
But as I wrote; I can appreciate the look.
It is far from pointless; the point is the design and I like it a lót. I would definitely wear it (without the ´Ferrari´).
If time measuring would be the point things get complicated real soon, so best not go there.
Last edited by Huertecilla; 30th December 2013 at 15:14.
Posting Permissions
