closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 47 of 47

Thread: How old does a watch have be before it can called "Vintage"?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    OVER MACHO GRANDE
    Posts
    12,137

    How old does a watch have be before it can called "Vintage"?

    The watch below is from 1992, we all know that Tudor has ceased production, but how old would a watch have to be before it can be called "vintage"?









  2. #2
    Master Thewatchbloke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oxfordshire UK
    Posts
    7,249
    You'll get tons of different answers Paul but I've always thought 25 years sounds right.

  3. #3
    Grand Master JasonM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    16,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Cannop View Post
    You'll get tons of different answers Paul but I've always thought 25 years sounds right.
    That's what I thought too...
    Cheers..
    Jase

  4. #4
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Sheffield, South Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,879
    Vintage to me at least means at least 30 yrs old. For others that will be different i guess.

  5. #5
    Craftsman xenon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    269
    25 years old is a minimum; although I consider real vintage 1970 and older.

    Edit: 100th post

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    OVER MACHO GRANDE
    Posts
    12,137
    Quote Originally Posted by xenon View Post
    25 years old is a minimum; although I consider real vintage 1970s and older.
    That's where my thinking came in, but I guess it might depend on the watch, the Tudor feels older having a design and dna from watches that are a lot older.

  7. #7
    Craftsman xenon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    269
    Quote Originally Posted by Captainhowdy View Post
    That's where my thinking came in, but I guess it might depend on the watch, the Tudor feels older having a design and dna from watches that are a lot older.
    I see - a vintage design. It's a shame the Tudor Sub is no longer made, it's a beautiful piece and a refreshing view to a tired design of the black dials.

  8. #8
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    467
    I think it counts as vintage. Anything over 20 years, especially if discontinued.

  9. #9
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    UP North.
    Posts
    12,694
    I think in reality it is much much older than any of the years mentioned in the replies tbh.Would a piece of handmade furniture be regarded as "vintage" @ 20 even 30 years old,I doubt it myself,so why do we think a 20 year old watch to be considered vintage!.
    The word "rare" is IMO "in some sales posts" used when not rare at all,maybe just rarely for sale,maybe just choice use of wording that catches the eye,rather like advertising something in a different currency to make it appear more expensive.

    I have a Speedy for sale which is from the 90's,do I advertise as vintage or just state it's age?.

    The word " vintage" in watch talk just doesn't translate to any other item we would certainly appreciate as being a vintage piece.

    Just my thoughts you understand,I may be totally wrong :)

  10. #10
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    UP North.
    Posts
    12,694
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward77 View Post
    I think it counts as vintage. Anything over 20 years, especially if discontinued.
    With regards to something "discontinued" it then becomes something collectible...perhaps!,if hundreds of millions were produced then maybe not

    Eg Eddies first DN of only 200 then yes discontinued = collectible .

  11. #11
    Judging by some sales descriptions it can be anything over a few years. ;-)

    R
    Ignorance breeds Fear. Fear breeds Hatred. Hatred breeds Ignorance. Break the chain.

  12. #12
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,294
    I have always considered the word "vintage" to mean at least 25 to 30 years old in relation to pretty much anything.

    Having done the sums and realised that will soon mean anything produced pre 1984 to 1989, I suddenly feel quite old and past it :)

  13. #13
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nottinghamshire United Kingdom
    Posts
    891

    vintage

    watches up to the 1960's/70 era are generally classed as Vintage, but I have seen later models, which are now discontinued classified as such.
    Ivan
    iwcforme

  14. #14
    Grand Master GraniteQuarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen, UK
    Posts
    27,875
    Co-sign around the 25 year mark, as with cars.

  15. #15
    Master Thorien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Herts
    Posts
    3,255
    Beautiful watch!
    I think if it's not made anymore and over 20ish years old, it counts as vintage...
    Last edited by Thorien; 27th December 2013 at 22:12.

  16. #16
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    Many watches etc will never become vintage. For something to be awarded that accolade it should be an outstanding product. The age of the object is almost incidental.
    Last edited by BrianT; 27th December 2013 at 16:26.

  17. #17
    Master lysanderxiii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    N 28 deg, 31' 18.4902 W80 deg 33' 40.035"
    Posts
    6,020
    Older that your kids.....

  18. #18
    Master sweets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol - UK
    Posts
    6,067
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Many watches etc will never become vintage. For something to be awarded that accolade it should be an outstanding product. The age of the object is almost incidental.
    Not sure this is true. There are many early 70s watches out there which would be perfectly correctly (imho) described as vintage, but whihc are far from outstanding.
    Vintage is a measure of age, not quality.

    Dave

    and for my money, 25 yrs old is as good a definition as we will agree on....

  19. #19
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bolton, England
    Posts
    392
    This is an interesting thread. Most people seem to think around 25 years. I personally would say anything from the 70's or earlier, but maybe that's just because I was born in that decade.

  20. #20
    Very difficult to define, and a bit subjective.

    In general (ie not necc watches) I sometimes think something has to go through a phase of looking dated before it turns into a classic. 70's items are a good example - anything from that decade was seen as horrific in the 80's and early 90's. There are of course exceptions before someone posts one, but in the watch world, designs like the RO and Nautilus were seen as very old hat for a while.

  21. #21
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,595
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Many watches etc will never become vintage. For something to be awarded that accolade it should be an outstanding product. The age of the object is almost incidental.
    I have to say that I don't understand or agree with that POV at all, and I'm not sure it's one that you'll find shared by many others. I think the 25 year rule is as good as any, although with such a definition there needs to be an acceptance that as the years fly by, "newer" watches fall into the vintage category. I always think of mid-eighties and older as vintage, anyway, which is there or thereabouts; maybe watches should have a plastic crystal, too?

  22. #22
    Master TakesALickin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    2,343
    A watch has to have wine spilled on it before it's considered vintage. Age is of no consequence.

  23. #23
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,842
    30 years puts it in the vintage ballpark
    RIAC

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by 100thmonkey View Post
    30 years puts it in the vintage ballpark
    +1 although given that something must be 100 years old before it can be considered antique, I might be inclined to go as far as 40 years before 'vintage' comes into play

  25. #25
    Any good year. Any good watch. Old tat will never anything but old tat. Crap is just crap whatever it s age.

  26. #26
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    I have to say that I don't understand or agree with that POV at all, and I'm not sure it's one that you'll find shared by many others. I think the 25 year rule is as good as any, although with such a definition there needs to be an acceptance that as the years fly by, "newer" watches fall into the vintage category. I always think of mid-eighties and older as vintage, anyway, which is there or thereabouts; maybe watches should have a plastic crystal, too?
    Oxford Dictionary definition of vintage.


    " Denoting something from the past of high quality, especially something representing the best of its kind:"

    Having searched I can find no definition which refers to a period of time. Vintage is a standard of quality not of age. Alright, I agree that the word is often used incorrectly, but that is another matter.
    Last edited by BrianT; 27th December 2013 at 21:15.

  27. #27
    Grand Master learningtofly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Everywhere & nowhere, baby
    Posts
    37,595
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Oxford Dictionary definition of vintage.


    " Denoting something from the past of high quality, especially something representing the best of its kind:"

    Having searched I can find no definition which refers to a period of time. Vintage is a standard of quality not of age. Alright, I agree that the word is often used incorrectly, but that is another matter.
    Well, I stand corrected, Brian - apologies for pouring cold water on your post! I've not seen that definition in use before, mind, and certainly not with regard to watches.

  28. #28
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by learningtofly View Post
    Well, I stand corrected, Brian - apologies for pouring cold water on your post! I've not seen that definition in use before, mind, and certainly not with regard to watches.
    It's only a discussion Tony. In fact someone mentioned cars. Now, if I remember correctly for these a period is mentioned, 1919-1931 is Vintage IIRC.

  29. #29
    Master DB9yeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8,264
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Having searched I can find no definition which refers to a period of time. Vintage is a standard of quality not of age. Alright, I agree that the word is often used incorrectly, but that is another matter.
    Well put - I originally considered it to be purely a better of age (and I'd consider 80s as 'vintage' or plexiglass) but you're right; it's denoted by quality.

    However, with cars specifically: an old style or model of car, specifically one made between 1919 and 1930. So your definition is not clear cut.

    Edited to add: posted the car thing at the same time!

  30. #30
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by DB9yeti View Post
    Well put - I originally considered it to be purely a better of age (and I'd consider 80s as 'vintage' or plexiglass) but you're right; it's denoted by quality.

    However, with cars specifically: an old style or model of car, specifically one made between 1919 and 1930. So your definition is not clear cut.

    Edited to add: posted the car thing at the same time!

    That's fine. But another interesting point, at least for me is Vintage motor cycles are deemed to be those produced more than 25 years ago.

    Maybe we on this forum should agree and set the World standard.

  31. #31
    There doesn't appear to be a single answer - as far as wine is concerned its vintage simply tells you which year the grapes were picked....so in this context 'vintage' does have a relationship to/with time

  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by Stanford View Post
    There doesn't appear to be a single answer - as far as wine is concerned its vintage simply tells you which year the grapes were picked....so in this context 'vintage' does have a relationship to/with time
    Yes but that time is variable. For instance the Douros top Port houses have declared 2011 as being a vintage year, the previous being 2007. It has nothing to do with age, a vintage is declared by general consensus to label the gathering from a particular year as being of sufficient quality to merit the description.

    Yes of course to award a particular year as vintage has a relationship with time . But that time is variable using the term for it's original purpose.

    Within the context of this thread relating to watches it is entirely different. Learningtofly mentioned 25 years, seems fair enough to me. Not sure what we are going to do about "Classic" though.
    Last edited by BrianT; 27th December 2013 at 22:05.

  33. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Yes but that time is variable. For instance the Douros top Port houses have declared 2011 as being a vintage year, the previous being 2007. It has nothing to do with age, a vintage is declared by general consensus to label the gathering from a particular year as being of sufficient quality to merit the description.

    Yes of course to award a particular year as vintage has a relationship with time . But that time is variable using the term for it's original purpose.

    Within the context of this thread relating to watches it is entirely different. Learningtofly mentioned 25 years, seems fair enough to me. Not sure what we are going to do about "Classic" though.
    If consensus cannot be reached on 'vintage' (other than with a few individuals on this forum) I wouldn't worry about 'classic' just yet

  34. #34
    Master patrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Within the EU and planning to stay.
    Posts
    6,257
    For me it's pre-quartz
    1880
    Pierre Curie discovers piezoelectricity.
    1888
    Friedrich Reinitzer and Otto Lehmann discover liquid crystals
    1927
    Warren Marrison invents the 1st quartz clock
    1954
    First watch batteries
    1959
    Invention of the integrated circuit
    1961-2
    Development of light-emitting diodes.
    1967
    The Beta 21 is the 1st quartz watch

    Choose your own date
    Last edited by patrick; 27th December 2013 at 22:19.

  35. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    4,666
    Blog Entries
    1
    It's just a label. Who cares.

  36. #36
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Coulsdon
    Posts
    1,263
    [QUOTE=Captainhowdy;2979766]The watch below is from 1992, we all know that Tudor has ceased production, but how old would a watch have to be before it can be called "vintage"?




    Hmmm - haven't Tudor relaunched??? http://www.tudorwatch.com/#/en/

  37. #37
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    1,093
    No, "Classic" is easy. Any model that Learningtofly has owned. :

  38. #38
    Master DB9yeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8,264
    Quote Originally Posted by KAS118 View Post
    Hmmm - haven't Tudor relaunched??? http://www.tudorwatch.com/#/en/
    Umm... not sure if serious...

    They never ceased production as a company (they're part of Rolex), just that particular Sub is no longer made.

  39. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    OVER MACHO GRANDE
    Posts
    12,137
    Quote Originally Posted by DB9yeti View Post
    Umm... not sure if serious...

    They never ceased production as a company (they're part of Rolex), just that particular Sub is no longer made.
    I don't see the Black Bay as a homage to the Tudor Sub, it doesn't even look like the 1954 dive watch.

  40. #40
    Grand Master Neil.C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    SE England
    Posts
    27,100
    It's just a meaningless word that is bandied about and has no real significance.
    Cheers,
    Neil.

  41. #41
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    UP North.
    Posts
    12,694
    Do You want the watch because you want / like it or just because it's a "vintage".

  42. #42
    Master Martin123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    3,023
    Double post
    Last edited by Martin123; 28th December 2013 at 10:15.

  43. #43
    Master Martin123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    3,023
    For me it's a plexi glass, tritium and great design, in addition yours has a top hat crystal, flat four insert and folded link bracelet so makes the vintage category easily.

  44. #44
    Master studs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Scotland
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Oxford Dictionary definition of vintage.


    " Denoting something from the past of high quality, especially something representing the best of its kind:"

    Having searched I can find no definition which refers to a period of time. Vintage is a standard of quality not of age. Alright, I agree that the word is often used incorrectly, but that is another matter.
    To be fair, if you're going to quote the OED, you ought to quote the whole* definition for balance (where you will see it can be used quite correctly with no necessary reference to quality as defined (probably in closest relation to our requirement from the word) at 4.c.)...


    -------------------------------
    vintage, n.

    (ˈvɪntɪdʒ)

    Also 5–6 vyntage.

    [a. AF. vintage (1353), altered f. of vindage, vendage, OF. vendange, by association with vinter or vintner.]

    1. The produce or yield of the vine, either as grapes or wine; the crop or yield of a vineyard or district in a single season. Now rare or Obs.
    Quot. 1460 refers to the capture of large supplies of wine from the French.

    b. poet. Wine, esp. of good or rare quality.

    c. Used with reference to the age or year of a particular wine, usually connoting one of good or outstanding quality; now spec. a wine made from the grape-crop of a certain district in a good year and kept separate on account of its quality.

    d. A property yielding wine. rare—1.

    2. a. The gathering of the ripe grapes in order to make them into wine, including the preliminary processes of wine-making, as pressing and placing the juice in the fermenting vats, etc.; the grape-harvest.
    Also in the phrase †to make vintage (see (b)).

    b. The season or time when this is done. Also with a and pl.

    3. transf. and fig. a. The date or period when a person was born or flourished.

    b. Hence, the date or period at which a thing was made or produced.

    4. attrib., as vintage-ball, -day, -dinner, -eve, feast, -festival, -god, -home (after harvest-home), -man, etc.

    b. In sense 1 c, as vintage claret, class, wine, etc. Also vintage chart, year (in quots. fig.).

    c. transf. Denoting an old style or model of something, esp. a vehicle; vintage car, a motor car made between 1905 (or 1917) and 1930; cf. veteran car s.v. veteran n. 3.

    d. Characteristic of the best period of a person's work, etc.; classic.
    -------------------------------

    Though to be even fairer, the full OED definition raises more ifs, buts and maybes than providing a specific answer to the OP's question where watches are concerned, and that's before we even touch on how any agreed demarcation line might move forward.

    Anyway, enough navel gazing, pre 1970 for me... and I'll consider redefining it after the next paradigm shift in my subjectivity... :)

    Edit: * I omitted to include the OED's "Quotations", as there's an absolute shed-load included within this definition.
    Last edited by studs; 28th December 2013 at 14:04.

  45. #45
    I would think anything before 1979

  46. #46
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    A Coruņa (Spain)
    Posts
    280
    I think a watch made before 1980 is vintage. I don't know why, but 80's means modern to me.

  47. #47
    Grand Master jwg663's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    21.5 km From Moscow
    Posts
    16,881
    It has to be older than the owner. If it isn't, then it's contemporary
    ______

    ​Jim.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information