closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: 43mm on a 6.75" wrist

  1. #1
    Master colin t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,637

    43mm on a 6.75" wrist

    Now that the exciting title has ensnared you, you need to be aware of the following before you decide to read further:

    1. This post has Rotary Chavitimer content
    2. This post features a look-at-me-all-casual-and-cool-with-my-hand-in-my-pocket shot (just for size observation purposes of course)

    Ok, still here?

    Well, it's very simple really...pictures of a 43mm (without crown) on a 6.75" wrist. What do you think....too much??






  2. #2
    Simple answer.
    The lugs of your watch are contained by your wrist, they do not overhang, so yes, it works.
    Its totally - 100% - that simple.

  3. #3
    Master Optimum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    5,044
    Looks fine to me. Stop worrying and enjoy. :)

  4. #4
    Master Marios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cyprus
    Posts
    4,815
    Looks good. Fits you fine too.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    On The Fringe
    Posts
    17,010
    Absolutely fine, bordering on spot on to be honest.

  6. #6
    Master Routers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northampton, UK
    Posts
    2,274
    Quote Originally Posted by Umbongo View Post
    Simple answer.
    The lugs of your watch are contained by your wrist, they do not overhang, so yes, it works.
    Its totally - 100% - that simple.
    What he said.

  7. #7
    Yep, looks fine to me.

  8. #8
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    61
    If six or more people on the bounce say its ok, then it's OK!

  9. #9
    A cracking fit.

  10. #10
    Spot on! I have same size wrists, can wear 44-47mm......but 43mm is the sweetspot

  11. #11
    Master Top Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    2,363
    Same size wrists here and I would say that fits a treat. Problem is when you go back to 40mm or less they look too small!

  12. #12
    Master SeanST150's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    2,778
    I would have thought not looking at the thread title. But after seeing the pictures I think it looks good. Just enjoy it.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    5,540
    Looks great to me. I too thought it was gonna look silly, but it doesn't at all.

  14. #14
    Master Optimum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    5,044
    What's the lug to lug length on the watch? I find that is a far better indicator as to what fits me than just diameter.

  15. #15
    Grand Master snowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    14,559
    Nothing wrong with the diameter, but the strap and lugs combined look wide on that watch which makes the whole thing look bulky, but the size is fine (unless you don't think so, in which case you decide )

    M
    Last edited by snowman; 7th June 2013 at 13:42.
    Breitling Cosmonaute 809 - What's not to like?

  16. #16
    Master colin t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Optimum View Post
    What's the lug to lug length on the watch? I find that is a far better indicator as to what fits me than just diameter.
    It's 50mm lug to lug, probably the max I can stretch to.

  17. #17
    Master Optimum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    5,044
    Quote Originally Posted by colin t View Post
    It's 50mm lug to lug, probably the max I can stretch to.
    I've got the same size wrist and that's my self-imposed max. I think the consensus is that you've got no worries here.

  18. #18
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    683
    I think it looks fine. Doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks though. If you like it, roll with it.

  19. #19
    As everyone else has said. Looks good.

  20. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    1,051
    I have similarly sized wrists so I'm pleased to see that it is possible to wear something that size - looks good.

    50mm lug-lug is about as far as I can go too.

  21. #21
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    London, Chicago
    Posts
    442

    perfect fit

    for this style and type of watch . Enjoy

  22. #22
    Craftsman Foucault717's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    413
    Quote Originally Posted by Umbongo View Post
    Simple answer.
    The lugs of your watch are contained by your wrist, they do not overhang, so yes, it works.
    Its totally - 100% - that simple.
    This is the guideline I've always followed. I like to leave little leeway though, I have pretty small wrists (about 7 inches) and usually go for max 40-42mm watches.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information