Now I understand most of the critics I read about the MM300. People judge the watch based on photos, rumors, hearsay and myth.Originally Posted by burnsey66
I have my second MM300 and never understoond the problem with the end links.
Agree.Originally Posted by TakesALickin
Can I be the myth buster here?
Maybe it a bit clearer now. The inner sides of the lugs are shaped, a bit like the Speedmaster, but in smaller scale.
First of all, I have never handled a SMP300!Originally Posted by Omegamanic
So, only about the MM300:
Bezel - The glossy finish it has is probably one of the best looking you can get. I'm talking about the look of it, how it changes its appearance by light. Same time it is not practical thanks to the fact it is one piece, no insert as we know.
Crystal - Again, it looks great. Someone said it is a porthole compared to many Swiss ones, which feels flat. Not the crystal only, but the dial feels sitting much deeper. This gives a nice classic diver watch feeling. Again crystal it's not as scratch resistant as sapphire.
Case - I'm sorry but I can't recall any Swiss watch with such a well finished complex surfaces, what the MM300 has. It's a piece of art.
Bracelet - I guess you can get better bracelet on Omegas. (But maybe they can cost almost a second hand MM300)
Crown - If you think the MM300 is a remake, then the crown is correct for the original. Action should be better, no doubt. Have to be careful by using.
Dial finish - very good, lume application doesn't bothers me as long as the lume is as bright as my dashboard in my car when entering a tunnel. Unlike the one piece bezel, this is very practical on a divers watch. (since divers always driving in tunnels :D )