Is this Vintage Omega for real?

[emstudio]

[Foggy]

No.


Cheers

Foggy

[Neil.C]

No.


Cheers

Foggy

:lol: :lol:

Succinct.

[pugster]

dial looks to have been overcooked on gas mark 2 :)

[jantje.vlaam]

Even if it was real, that's an ugly watch!!!

[walkerwek1958]

Looks extremely dodgy to me......I`d like to see what's inside it.

Paul

[emstudio]

caliber 265

[Plake]

caliber 265

If it is real I wouldn't want it anywhere near my wrist. Enough radium to melt your arm off :lol:

Actually, the radioactivity would be quite a good way of determining if it is real or not.

[pacifichrono]

If the serial number on the movement was maybe ten years earlier than its actual 1951 +/- manufacture, I might be inclined to consider it authentic. But that dial surely doesn't look like a 1950s style or aging.

[Plake]

If the serial number on the movement was maybe ten years earlier than its actual 1951 +/- manufacture, I might be inclined to consider it authentic. But that dial surely doesn't look like a 1950s style or aging.

Just noticed the circle T

A dial of the movement's age would be radium, not tritium.

That combined with the use of a trowel to apply the lume suggests that it's a maverick redial at best.

[Dave Downing]

Is it an eBay Ukranian special?

Incidentally, some of them look okay, even if they are an offence against God...

Dd

[aldfort]

I suspect it's a "bitza" at best, the movement looks ok-ish.