Ugly beyond belief, and £12K :lol:
I have my opinions but what do you think.
A thing of beauty or is it the mother of all ugly watches
By the way its costs £12k
Ugly beyond belief, and £12K :lol:
Cool and ugly at the same time imho. There's one for sale on ebay right now... I'm curious, very curious!
I'm not as think as you drunk I am.
Looks a like an eBay frankenwatch like those supposed Panerias with open hearts. I'll offer £25.
Utterly pointless. :laughing5:
Well IMHO. :twisted:
"A thing of beauty or is it the mother of all ugly watches?"
Mama............................... :binky:
F.T.F.A.
If it weren't for some U-Boats, I'd say it's the ugliest watch I've ever seen :pale:
Cheers
Stern
Nuff said.
Gary
I agree 100% apart from some grahams its by far the uggliest watch I have ever seen and £12k im sorry I woudnt pay £12 its fugly beyond words I would rather have a JLC,Patek or AP for that and at least people will like them this is just beyond words, I think a 5 years old child could have done better in fact it looks like and airfix kit gone wrong
i,ve seen worse,zenith continue to lose the plot
+1 :lol:Originally Posted by magirus
Cheers,
Daddel.
Got a new watch, divers watch it is, had to drown the bastard to get it!
It's worse than a ginger stepchild!
ugly
Pretty hideous but I've seen much worse :shock:
"I looked with pity not untinged with scorn upon these trivial-minded passers-by"
[quote="SternG"]If it weren't for some U-Boats, I'd say it's the ugliest watch I've ever seen :pale:
+1
:lol:
Looks like a Vent Axia. But if one came along at the right price I'd consider it.
dunk
"Well they would say that ... wouldn't they!"
I'm thinking it's an acquired taste.
It's just not a taste that I can ever see myself acquiring.
Originally Posted by sonyman
Minging. I wouldn't touch it with yours.
Now as your asking.....................Bloody awful looking watch.
Terrible,just terrible,Zenith really have lost the plot with this one :wink:
The old boss of Zenith responsible for these hideous things have resigned hasn't he? I can“t remember his name though.
I saw a new Zenith Model, can't remember name yet again, which was much nicer and true to the Zenith heritage. I hope I wasn't just dreaming.
Can anyone confirm this?
Cheers
/john
Well its certainly not the ugliest i've seen.
Paul
GOT...TO...KILL...CAPTAIN STUPID!
That is fairly typical of the Nataf era for his Defys.
It isn't my cup of tea but then I was not part of the target... So my opinion is worth less than 2p in that case :D
However, considering how many people working for Zenith lamented TN's departure immediately, and considering that one of Dufour's first moves was a public humiliation of 59 employees made redundant; Considering the 1887 saga and JCB's attempt to say he did not know (I wonder who signed the agreement with Seiko then) I have come to expect little from LVMH group.
And Zenith used to be among my favourite brands
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
I like it!!! :bom:
While its not my taste at all and the price not justified, the built quality and detail is impressive; will not be easy to sell at 12K though.
Had a chance to handle a few in the past year. Wonder if they will get a cult status in the future; now that Nataf :roll: is gone and Zenith is taking a new direction.
Just think, you could have a Patek for that, or a Blancpain, or, well anything that someone who had any appreciation of horology would appleal too...
THAT (zenith)on the other hand , is a marketing mans dogs dinner.... :sad3:
+1....just awful!Originally Posted by melhick
Sin as ugly... :D
:D +1Originally Posted by vikkyrob
Originally Posted by mr1973
I 'll agree with this quote - now the tourbillon version of this - not the zero G is a watch I covet.
It's just a matter of time...
Sorry, not my cup of tea, but then there is a market for unreadable faces with exposed movements :lol:
No still minging
Part of me wants to say fugly the other half of me is thinking what are the resale prices like :?
Yes, horrible. But don't be too hard on Nataf. His unreadable face with exposed movement formula also produced some rather nicer results. Not many but some. Well I think so anyway.Originally Posted by plw
Dave
Don't they ever do any market rersearch?
Jeez.... If I was the incoming CEO (or whatever his title is) I would be asking some serious questions of the Sales Director.
Rob
Be careful writing things like that, a moron once called me a t**t for such tongue in cheek blaspheming. :roll: :wink:Originally Posted by SternG
F.T.F.A.
Hi
It's just so unnecessary - why not just stick with the utterly lovely...............el Primero
it's perfectly balanced and beautiful to boot !
Thanks Neil
amazing movement but ulgy as shit watch .
theres a place does them at crazy discounts as they cant give them away
Time wharp:Originally Posted by flame
Lets develop this watch without an open face or bull... skip anything inbetween..... success....
Well why not just reissue this then... on a Timefactors Rally strap. :lol:
About on par with this monstrosity...
Originally Posted by GraniteQuarry
At least you can close your eyes and listen to SuBo sing you cant close your eyes and tell the time with that fugly watch
I'd still rather wake up next to the watch !! :lol:Originally Posted by sonyman
I often close my eyes and listen to my watch's singing...Originally Posted by sonyman
SWMBO is usually not impressed by that...
Originally Posted by magirus
Well, I don't think anybody took offence. At least I said "some" :D
Cheers
Stern
If you put it out in the wind, would it generate electricity?
Yes or No, it is still ug-i-ly.
+1Originally Posted by boddah
Andy
Wanted - Damasko DC57
i,ve just returned from cheshire oaks they now have tag heur outlet they had this particular model inside the shop in titainium,rrp£16k reduced to around 8k,there were also afew other models including the reserve de marche,retailing about 6k reduced to just under 3k, i wouldn,t say it was ugly but i felt the same way about the rolex deep sea when i saw that too big and would wear like a brick,the de marche i felt looked quite elegant and would hold it,s own with any rolex and with a 3k reduction looked quite tempting.
Wouldn't be for me